ArticleBMJ quality & safety2016
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.
Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07529886 (Symptoms of Anxiety and/or Depression and the Shared Decision Making), which is not on this map. Cited by 1,307 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Symptoms of Anxiety and/or Depression and the Shared Decision Making (SDM) Process in Older Patients With Critical Limb Threatening Ischaemia (CLTI)
Who cites it
1,307 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Telehealth-related education and training: a systematic review of recent developments since the COVID-19 pandemic.Medical education online · 2026Pooled it
- Eligibility definitions and response rate accuracy in studies using routinely collected PROMs: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Behaviorally Informed Text Messaging to Promote Colon Cancer Screening: A Quality Improvement Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Delivering online communication skills training for radiation therapists.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Development and implementation of a supportive care model for cancer patients in the last days of life: A hospital-based program.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Effects of an Inpatient Program on Medication Errors in Hospitalized People with Parkinson's Disease.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Low-barrier tobacco screening and cessation outreach: A multisite veterans affairs quality improvement initiative.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Navigating the transition to digital transfusion safety in a resource-limited setting: a prospective implementation study and operational workflow analysis.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Evaluating the quality and safety of a nurse practitioner-led virtual clinic for secondary prevention in stable coronary artery disease: a pilot feasibility study.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Buckinghamshire CAMHS neurodevelopmental assessment pathway transformation: a quality improvement project.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Improving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with a penicillin allergy label: a quality improvement study.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Sixty golden minutes: a quality improvement bundle reduces morbidities in at-risk preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Formalising remote consulting in primary care services for underserved populations with long-term conditions in sub-Saharan Africa: a process evaluation and stakeholder engagement.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Anticholinergic Burden Scoring in Orthogeriatric Patients: A Two-Cycle Quality Improvement Audit.Cureus · 2026Article
- Aligning Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention Through Repeated Assessment and Feedback: A Multisite Quality Improvement Initiative in Viet Nam.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Optimizing outpatient pharmacologic treatment for veterans with alcohol use disorder using an academic detailing approach for primary care providers in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs: A retrospective quasi-experimental study.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Article
- Transforming Surgical Training: The Evolution of the COSECSA eLogbook Through a Theory of Change Framework.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- From order to image: reducing CT order to exam start time through targeted quality improvement in the ED.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- Extended recovery room as a strategy to reduce inappropriate ICU admissions: an Italian hospital experience.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
1,247 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the publication of Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasises the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value and safety of healthcare: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve healthcare, recognising that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (http://www.squire-statement.org).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.