Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26369874›Full record

ReviewNeurologia medico-chirurgica2015

The Significance of Cerebral Hemodynamics Imaging in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Brief Review.

Kohkichi Hosoda

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kohkichi HosodaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine.
Kobe University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The indication of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is principally determined by the presence or absence of symptoms and the degree of stenosis. However, the results of recent studies have implicated the usefulness of cerebral hemodynamics imaging for perioperative assessments. Many studies using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) have demonstrated that cerebral hemodynamics imaging assessments are useful in the prediction and assessment of post-CEA hyperperfusion. In studies using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, SPECT, or positron-emission tomography (PET), cerebral hemodynamic impairment is highly likely to increase the risk of cerebral infarction in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. In other studies using the same modalities, cerebral hemodynamic impairment might be related to cognitive impairment in carotid artery stenosis, and this cognitive impairment might be improved with CEA. Nuclear medicine techniques involve the injection of radioactive tracers. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is an emerging technique of perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the noninvasive measurement of cerebral perfusion. ASL could detect pathologic states such as hypoperfusion, impaired vasoreactivity, and postoperative hyperperfusion activities that are equivalent to SPECT. In addition, regional perfusion imaging visualizes cerebral perfusion territories by selective ASL. In conclusion, cerebral hemodynamic imaging would be useful for the perioperative assessment of CEA. However, there is a lack of sufficient scientific evidence to confirm the benefits, necessitating further study.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationEndarterectomy, CarotidBrainCarotid StenosisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

Identifiers

PMID26369874
PMCPMC4663027
OpenAlexW2174800473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.