Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26369640›Full record

Trial reportStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2015

Radiotherapy for benign achillodynia. Long-term results of the Erlangen Dose Optimization Trial.

Oliver J Ott, Carolin Jeremias, Udo S Gaipl, Benjamin Frey, Manfred Schmidt, Rainer Fietkau

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Implementing a low-dose radiation therapy program for musculoskeletal pain disorders: tips, tricks, and essentials for clinical researchers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Low-dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) in Managing Osteoarthritis: A Comprehensive Review.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2025
    Review
  6. Radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases: benefits and long-term risks.International journal of radiation biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Low-dose radiotherapy of osteoarthritis: from biological findings to clinical effects-challenges for future studies.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Review
  8. Non-Oncological Radiotherapy: A Review of Modern Approaches.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Radiotherapy for osteoarthritis-an analysis of 295 joints treated with a linear accelerator.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  12. Radiotherapy for osteoarthritis of the ankle and tarsal joints-analysis of 66 joints.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  13. Re-irradiation for osteoarthritis-retrospective analysis of 217 joints.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2019
    Article
  14. Radiotherapy for painful benign skeletal disorders : Results of a retrospective clinical quality assessment.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Immune modulatory effects of radiotherapy as basis for well-reasoned radioimmunotherapies.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Low-dose external beam radiotherapy for greater trochanteric pain syndrome : Target volume definition and treatment outcome.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2017
    Observational
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oliver J OttDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. oliver.ott@uk-erlangen.de.
Carolin JeremiasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Udo S GaiplDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Benjamin FreyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Manfred SchmidtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Rainer FietkauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of two dose-fractionation schedules for radiotherapy of achillodynia. PATIENTS AND

methodsBetween February 2006 and February 2010, 112 evaluable patients were recruited for this prospective trial. All patients received orthovoltage radiotherapy. One course consisted of 6 fractions/3 weeks. In the case of insufficient remission of pain after 6 weeks, a second series was performed. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either single doses of 0.5 or 1.0 Gy. The endpoint was pain reduction. Pain was measured before, right after (early response), 6 weeks after (delayed response), and approximately 2 years after radiotherapy (long-term response) with a questionnaire-based visual analogue scale (VAS) and a comprehensive pain score (CPS).

resultsThe median follow-up was 24 months (range, 11-56). The overall early, delayed, and long-term response rates for all patients were 84 %, 88 %, and 95 %, respectively. The mean VAS values before treatment for early, delayed, and long-term responses for the 0.5-Gy and 1.0-Gy groups were 55.7 ± 21.0 and 58.2 ± 23.5 (p = 0.53), 38.0 ± 23.2 and 30.4 ± 22.6 (p = 0.08), 35.5 ± 25.9 and 30.9 ± 25.4 (p = 0.52), and 11.2 ± 16.4 and 15.3 ± 18.9 (p = 0.16), respectively. The mean CPS values before treatment for early, delayed, and long-term responses were 8.2 ± 3.0 and 8.9 ± 3.3 (p = 0.24), 5.6 ± 3.1 and 5.4 ± 3.3 (p = 0.76), 4.4 ± 2.6 and 5.3 ± 3.8 (p = 0.58), and 2.2 ± 2.9 and 2.8 ± 3.3 (p = 0.51), respectively. No significant differences in long-term response quality between the two arms was found (p = 0.73).

conclusionRadiotherapy is a very effective treatment for the management of benign achillodynia. For radiation protection, the dose for a radiotherapy series should not exceed 3.0 Gy.

Indexed as

Dose Fractionation, RadiationRadiotherapy DosageAchilles TendonAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesTendinopathyTreatment OutcomeAchillodyniaBenign degenerative diseasePainRadiotherapyRandomized trial

Identifiers

PMID26369640
OpenAlexW1617107951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.