Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26369533›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2015

CYP2D6 genotype- and endoxifen-guided tamoxifen dose escalation increases endoxifen serum concentrations without increasing side effects.

V O Dezentjé, F L Opdam, H Gelderblom, J Hartigh den, T Van der Straaten, R Vree, E Maartense, C H Smorenburg, H Putter, A S Dieudonné and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Genes · 2026
    Article
  7. Influence of CYP2D6 polymorphisms on tamoxifen side effects in patients with breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted antineoplastic drugs.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. ClinicalCancers · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Non-Journal of clinical medicine · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

V O DezentjéDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. v.dezentje@gmail.com.
F L OpdamDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
H GelderblomDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Hartigh denDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
T Van der StraatenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
R VreeDepartment of Surgery, Diaconessenhuis, Leiden, The Netherlands.
E MaartenseDepartment of Internal Medicine, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft, The Netherlands.
C H SmorenburgDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Center Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
H PutterDepartment of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
A S DieudonnéDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
P NevenDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
C J H Van de VeldeDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J W R NortierDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
H-J GuchelaarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLKU Leuven · BEDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLMedisch Centrum Alkmaar · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer patients with absent or reduced CYP2D6 activity and consequently low endoxifen levels may benefit less from tamoxifen treatment. CYP2D6 poor and intermediate metabolizers may need a personalized increased tamoxifen dose to achieve effective endoxifen serum concentrations, without increasing toxicity. From a prospective study population of early breast cancer patients using tamoxifen (CYPTAM: NTR1509), 12 CYP2D6 poor and 12 intermediate metabolizers were selected and included in a one-step tamoxifen dose escalation study during 2 months. The escalated dose was calculated by multiplying the individual's endoxifen level at baseline relative to the average endoxifen concentration observed in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers by 20 mg (120 mg maximum). Endoxifen levels and tamoxifen toxicity were determined at baseline and after 2 months, just before patients returned to the standard dose of 20 mg. Tamoxifen dose escalation in CYP2D6 poor and intermediate metabolizers significantly increased endoxifen concentrations (p < 0.001; p = 0.002, respectively) without increasing side effects. In intermediate metabolizers, dose escalation increased endoxifen to levels comparable with those observed in extensive metabolizers. In poor metabolizers, the mean endoxifen level increased from 24 to 81 % of the mean concentration in extensive metabolizers. In all patients, the endoxifen threshold of 5.97 ng/ml (=16.0 nM) reported by Madlensky et al. was reached following dose escalation. CYP2D6 genotype- and endoxifen-guided tamoxifen dose escalation increased endoxifen concentrations without increasing short-term side effects. Whether such tamoxifen dose escalation is effective and safe in view of long-term toxic effects is uncertain and needs to be explored.

Indexed as

GenotypeAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Drug MonitoringFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPharmacogeneticsPhenotypeProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTamoxifenTreatment Outcome4-hydroxy-N-desmethyltamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6TamoxifenCYP2D6Early breast cancerEndoxifen

Identifiers

PMID26369533
PMCPMC4589558
OpenAlexW1836143067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.