Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26369522›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2015

The effect of heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation on Aδ-, C- and Aβ-fibre brain responses in humans.

Diana M Torta, Maxim V Churyukanov, Leon Plaghki, André Mouraux

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Attention to pain! A neurocognitive perspective on attentional modulation of pain in neuroimaging studies.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Diana M TortaLaboratoire d'algologie, Institute of Neurosciences (IONS), Université catholique de Louvain, 53, Avenue Mounier - UCL 53.75, B-1200, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Maxim V ChuryukanovLaboratoire d'algologie, Institute of Neurosciences (IONS), Université catholique de Louvain, 53, Avenue Mounier - UCL 53.75, B-1200, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Leon PlaghkiLaboratoire d'algologie, Institute of Neurosciences (IONS), Université catholique de Louvain, 53, Avenue Mounier - UCL 53.75, B-1200, Bruxelles, Belgium.
André MourauxLaboratoire d'algologie, Institute of Neurosciences (IONS), Université catholique de Louvain, 53, Avenue Mounier - UCL 53.75, B-1200, Bruxelles, Belgium.
UCLouvain · BESechenov University · RU

Funding

European Research Council 336130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human studies have shown that heterotopic nociceptive conditioning stimulation (HNCS) applied to a given body location reduces the percept and brain responses elicited by noxious test stimuli delivered at a remote body location. It remains unclear to what extent this effect of HNCS relies on the spinal-bulbar-spinal loop mediating the effect of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNICs) described in animals, and/or on top-down cortical mechanisms modulating nociception. Importantly, some studies have examined the effects of HNCS on the brain responses to nociceptive input conveyed by Aδ-fibres. In contrast, no studies have explored the effects of HNCS on the responses to selective nociceptive C-fibre input and non-nociceptive Aβ-fibre input. In this study, we measured the intensity of perception and event-related potentials (ERPs) to stimuli activating Aδ-, C- and Aβ-fibres, before, during and after HNCS, obtained by immersing one foot in painful cold water. We observed that (i) the perceived intensity of nociceptive Aδ- and C-stimuli was reduced during HNCS, and (ii) the ERPs elicited by Aδ- and Aβ- and C-stimuli were also reduced during HNCS. Importantly, because Aβ-ERPs are related to primary afferents that ascend directly through the dorsal columns without being relayed at spinal level, the modulation of these responses may not be explained by an influence of descending projections modulating the transmission of nociceptive input at spinal level. Therefore, our results indicate that, in humans, HNCS should be used with caution as a direct measure of DNIC-related mechanisms.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsAdultCerebral CortexCold TemperatureElectric StimulationElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansLasersMaleMiddle AgedNerve Fibers, MyelinatedNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedNociceptionPain MeasurementPain Thresholdcold pressor testdiffuse noxious inhibitory controlevent-related potentialsheterotopic noxious conditioning stimulipain

Identifiers

PMID26369522
PMCPMC5321533
OpenAlexW1950929605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.