Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26369507›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2015

Circulating biomarkers for gliomas.

Manfred Westphal, Katrin Lamszus

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. A Dual-Channel Synergistic Ultrasensitive Biosensor for Tumor Liquid Biopsy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. A Synopsis of Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: Past and Present.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manfred WestphalDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Katrin LamszusLaboratory for Brain Tumor Biology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Brain (Germany) · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, gliomas are diagnosed by neuroimaging, and refined diagnosis requires resection or biopsy to obtain tumour tissue for histopathological classification and grading. Blood-derived biomarkers, therefore, would be useful as minimally invasive markers that could support diagnosis and enable monitoring of tumour growth and response to treatment. Such circulating biomarkers could distinguish true progression from therapy-associated changes such as radiation necrosis, and help evaluate the persistence or disappearance of a therapeutic target, such as an oncoprotein or a targetable gene mutation, after targeted therapy. Unlike for other tumours, circulating biomarkers for gliomas are still being defined and are not yet in use in clinical practice. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) isolated from plasma has been shown to reflect the mutational status of glioblastoma, and extracellular vesicles (EVs) containing ctDNA, microRNA and proteins function as rapidly adapting reservoirs for glioma biomarkers such as typical DNA mutations, regulatory microRNAs and oncoproteins. Ideally, circulating tumour cells could enable profiling of the whole-tumour genome, but they are difficult to detect and can reflect only a single cell type of the heterogeneous tumour composition, whereas EVs reflect the complex heterogeneity of the whole tumour, as well as its adaptations to therapy. Although all categories of potential blood-derived biomarkers need to be developed further, findings from other tumour types suggest that EVs are the most promising biomarkers.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID26369507
OpenAlexW1448866238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.