Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26369410›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

The effect of performance-based financing on illness, care-seeking and treatment among children: an impact evaluation in Rwanda.

Martha Priedeman Skiles, Siân L Curtis, Paulin Basinga, Gustavo Angeles, Harsha Thirumurthy

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martha Priedeman SkilesThe Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 400 Meadowmont Village Circle, 3rd Floor, Chapel Hill, NC, 27517, USA. mpskiles25@gmail.com.
Siân L CurtisThe Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 400 Meadowmont Village Circle, 3rd Floor, Chapel Hill, NC, 27517, USA. scurtis@email.unc.edu.
Paulin BasingaGlobal Health Program, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA. paulin.basinga@gatesfoundation.org.
Gustavo AngelesThe Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 400 Meadowmont Village Circle, 3rd Floor, Chapel Hill, NC, 27517, USA. gustavo_angeles@unc.edu.
Harsha ThirumurthyThe Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 400 Meadowmont Village Circle, 3rd Floor, Chapel Hill, NC, 27517, USA. harsha@unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USBill & Melinda Gates Foundation · US

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerformance-based financing (PBF) strategies are promoted as a supply-side, results-based financing mechanism to improve primary health care. This study estimated the effects of Rwanda's PBF program on less-incentivized child health services and examined the differential program impact by household poverty.

methodsDistricts were allocated to intervention and comparison for PBF implementation in Rwanda. Using Demographic Health Survey data from 2005 to 2007-08, a community-level panel dataset of 5781 children less than 5 years of age from intervention and comparison districts was created. The impacts of PBF on reported childhood illness, facility care-seeking, and treatment received were estimated using a difference-in-differences model with community fixed effects. An interaction term between poverty and the program was estimated to identify the differential effect of PBF among children from poorer families.

resultsThere was no measurable difference in estimated probability of reporting illness with diarrhea, fever or acute respiratory infections between the intervention and comparison groups. Seeking care at a facility for these illnesses increased over time, however no differential effect by PBF was seen. The estimated effect of PBF on receipt of treatment for poor children is 45 percentage points higher (p = 0.047) compared to the non-poor children seeking care for diarrhea or fever.

conclusionsPBF, a supply-side incentive program, improved the quality of treatment received by poor children conditional on patients seeking care, but it did not impact the propensity to seek care. These findings provide additional evidence that PBF incentivizes the critical role staff play in assuring quality services, but does little to influence consumer demand for these services. Efforts to improve child health need to address both supply and demand, with additional attention to barriers due to poverty if equity in service use is a concern.

Indexed as

Financing, GovernmentPatient Acceptance of Health CareReimbursement, IncentiveAcute DiseaseAdultChildChild Health ServicesChild, PreschoolDiarrheaFemaleFeverHealth SurveysHumansMalePovertyPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID26369410
PMCPMC4570690
OpenAlexW2134203589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.