Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26369325›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2015

Interprofessional collaboration milestones: advocating for common assessment criteria in graduate medical education.

Majken T Wingo, Rachel D A Havyer, Nneka I Comfere, Darlene R Nelson, Darcy A Reed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Majken T WingoDivision of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. wingo.majken@mayo.edu.
Rachel D A HavyerDivision of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. havyer.rachel@mayo.edu.
Nneka I ComfereDepartments of Dermatology and Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. comfere.nneka@mayo.edu.
Darlene R NelsonDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. nelson.darlene@mayo.edu.
Darcy A ReedDivision of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. reed.darcy@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMilestone-based assessments of resident physicians inform critical decisions regarding resident competence and advancement. Thus, it is essential that milestone evaluations are based upon strong validity evidence and that consistent evaluation criteria are used across residency programs. A common approach to assessment of interprofessional collaboration milestones is particularly important since standardized measures of individual resident competence in interprofessional collaboration have not been established. DISCUSSION: We propose that assessments of interprofessional collaboration in graduate medical education meet common criteria, namely, these assessments should: 1) measure competency of an individual resident, 2) occur in the context of an interprofessional team, 3) be ascertained via direct observation of the resident, 4) be performed in a real-world clinical practice setting (such as a hospital ward, outpatient clinic, or operating room). We present the evidence-based rationale for these criteria and cite examples of published assessment instruments that fulfill one or more of the criteria, however further research is needed to ensure fidelity of assessments. The proposed criteria may assist residency educators as they endeavor to provide robust and consistent assessments of interprofessional collaboration milestones.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterprofessional RelationsEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansInternship and ResidencyPatient Care TeamUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26369325
PMCPMC4570478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.