Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26368924›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Artificial Intelligence versus Statistical Modeling and Optimization of Cholesterol Oxidase Production by using Streptomyces Sp.

Lakshmi Pathak, Vineeta Singh, Ram Niwas, Khwaja Osama, Saif Khan, Shafiul Haque, C K M Tripathi, B N Mishra

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A review of algorithmic approaches for cell culture media optimization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lakshmi PathakDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Engineering and Technology (Uttar Pradesh Technical University), Lucknow, 226021, India.
Vineeta SinghMicrobiology Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Sitapur Road, Lucknow, 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ram NiwasMicrobiology Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Sitapur Road, Lucknow, 226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Khwaja OsamaDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Engineering and Technology (Uttar Pradesh Technical University), Lucknow, 226021, India.
Saif KhanDeratment of Clinical Nutrition, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Ha'il University, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia.
Shafiul HaqueCentre for Drug Research, Faculty of Pharmacy, Viikki Biocenter-2, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FIN-00014, Finland; Research and Scientific Studies Unit, College of Nursing & Applied Health Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, 45142, Saudi Arabia.
C K M TripathiFermentation Technology Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Sitapur Road, Lucknow-226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
B N MishraDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Engineering and Technology (Uttar Pradesh Technical University), Lucknow, 226021, India.
Central Drug Research Institute · INDr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University · INJazan University · SAUniversity of Ha'il · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholesterol oxidase (COD) is a bi-functional FAD-containing oxidoreductase which catalyzes the oxidation of cholesterol into 4-cholesten-3-one. The wider biological functions and clinical applications of COD have urged the screening, isolation and characterization of newer microbes from diverse habitats as a source of COD and optimization and over-production of COD for various uses. The practicability of statistical/ artificial intelligence techniques, such as response surface methodology (RSM), artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic algorithm (GA) have been tested to optimize the medium composition for the production of COD from novel strain Streptomyces sp. NCIM 5500. All experiments were performed according to the five factor central composite design (CCD) and the generated data was analysed using RSM and ANN. GA was employed to optimize the models generated by RSM and ANN. Based upon the predicted COD concentration, the model developed with ANN was found to be superior to the model developed with RSM. The RSM-GA approach predicted maximum of 6.283 U/mL COD production, whereas the ANN-GA approach predicted a maximum of 9.93 U/mL COD concentration. The optimum concentrations of the medium variables predicted through ANN-GA approach were: 1.431 g/50 mL soybean, 1.389 g/50 mL maltose, 0.029 g/50 mL MgSO4, 0.45 g/50 mL NaCl and 2.235 ml/50 mL glycerol. The experimental COD concentration was concurrent with the GA predicted yield and led to 9.75 U/mL COD production, which was nearly two times higher than the yield (4.2 U/mL) obtained with the un-optimized medium. This is the very first time we are reporting the statistical versus artificial intelligence based modeling and optimization of COD production by Streptomyces sp. NCIM 5500.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceBacterial ProteinsCholesterol OxidaseCulture MediaFermentationModels, GeneticNeural Networks, ComputerStreptomycesBacterial ProteinsCholesterol OxidaseCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID26368924
PMCPMC4569268
OpenAlexW2220403730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.