ArticleApplied optics2015
Simulation-based evaluation of the resolution and quantitative accuracy of temperature-modulated fluorescence tomography.
Article in Applied optics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fast ICCD-based temperature modulated fluorescence tomography.Applied optics · 2023Article
- Development of a preclinical CCD-based temperature modulated fluorescence tomography platform.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Development of a theranostic preclinical fluorescence molecular tomography/cone beam CT-guided irradiator platform.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- A thermo-sensitive fluorescent agent based method for excitation light leakage rejection for fluorescence molecular tomography.Physics in medicine and biology · 2019Article
- Newly-Engineered Materials for Bio-Imaging Technology: A Focus on the Hybrid System of Ultrasound and Fluorescence.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
- Experimental evaluation of the resolution and quantitative accuracy of temperature-modulated fluorescence tomography.Applied optics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional fluorescence tomography (FT) can recover the distribution of fluorescent agents within a highly scattering medium. However, poor spatial resolution remains its foremost limitation. Previously, we introduced a new fluorescence imaging technique termed "temperature-modulated fluorescence tomography" (TM-FT), which provides high-resolution images of fluorophore distribution. TM-FT is a multimodality technique that combines fluorescence imaging with focused ultrasound to locate thermo-sensitive fluorescence probes using a priori spatial information to drastically improve the resolution of conventional FT. In this paper, we present an extensive simulation study to evaluate the performance of the TM-FT technique on complex phantoms with multiple fluorescent targets of various sizes located at different depths. In addition, the performance of the TM-FT is tested in the presence of background fluorescence. The results obtained using our new method are systematically compared with those obtained with the conventional FT. Overall, TM-FT provides higher resolution and superior quantitative accuracy, making it an ideal candidate for in vivo preclinical and clinical imaging. For example, a 4 mm diameter inclusion positioned in the middle of a synthetic slab geometry phantom (D:40 mm×W:100 mm) is recovered as an elongated object in the conventional FT (x=4.5 mm; y=10.4 mm), while TM-FT recovers it successfully in both directions (x=3.8 mm; y=4.6 mm). As a result, the quantitative accuracy of the TM-FT is superior because it recovers the concentration of the agent with a 22% error, which is in contrast with the 83% error of the conventional FT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.