Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26368675›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Prevalence of the dhfr and dhps Mutations among Pregnant Women in Rural Burkina Faso Five Years after the Introduction of Intermittent Preventive Treatment with Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine.

Marc C Tahita, Halidou Tinto, Annette Erhart, Adama Kazienga, Robert Fitzhenry, Chantal VanOvermeir, Anna Rosanas-Urgell, Jean-Bosco Ouedraogo, Robert T Guiguemde, Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Putative molecular markers ofFrontiers in epidemiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Exploring the relationship betweenThe Pan African medical journal · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Infection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Marc C TahitaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Direction Régionale de l'Ouest (IRSS/DRO), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso; Clinical Research Unit of Nanoro (IRSS-CRUN), Nanoro, Burkina Faso; Unité de Recherche sur le Paludisme et Maladies Tropicales Négligées, Centre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso; Malariology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM), Antwerp, Belgium; International Health Unit, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Halidou TintoInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Direction Régionale de l'Ouest (IRSS/DRO), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso; Clinical Research Unit of Nanoro (IRSS-CRUN), Nanoro, Burkina Faso; Unité de Recherche sur le Paludisme et Maladies Tropicales Négligées, Centre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Annette ErhartMalariology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM), Antwerp, Belgium.
Adama KaziengaClinical Research Unit of Nanoro (IRSS-CRUN), Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Robert FitzhenryMalariology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM), Antwerp, Belgium.
Chantal VanOvermeirMalariology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM), Antwerp, Belgium.
Anna Rosanas-UrgellMalariology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM), Antwerp, Belgium.
Jean-Bosco OuedraogoInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Direction Régionale de l'Ouest (IRSS/DRO), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso; Clinical Research Unit of Nanoro (IRSS-CRUN), Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Robert T GuiguemdeClinical Research Unit of Nanoro (IRSS-CRUN), Nanoro, Burkina Faso; Unité de Recherche sur le Paludisme et Maladies Tropicales Négligées, Centre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso; Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Santé (INSSA), Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Jean-Pierre Van GeertruydenInternational Health Unit, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Umberto D'AlessandroMalariology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM), Antwerp, Belgium; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Medical Research Council Unit, Banjul, The Gambia.
Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BECentre Muraz · BFInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFMRC Unit the Gambia · GMUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergence and spread of drug resistance represents one of the biggest challenges for malaria control in endemic regions. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is currently deployed as intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) to prevent the adverse effects of malaria on the mother and her offspring. Nevertheless, its efficacy is threatened by SP resistance which can be estimated by the prevalence of dihydropteroate synthase (dhps) and dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) mutations. This was measured among pregnant women in the health district of Nanoro, Burkina Faso.

methodsFrom June to December 2010, two hundred and fifty six pregnant women in the second and third trimester, attending antenatal care with microscopically confirmed malaria infection were invited to participate, regardless of malaria symptoms. A blood sample was collected on filter paper and analyzed by PCR-RFLP for the alleles 51, 59, 108, 164 in the pfdhfr gene and 437, 540 in the pfdhps gene.

resultsThe genes were successfully genotyped in all but one sample (99.6%; 255/256) for dhfr and in 90.2% (231/256) for dhps. The dhfr C59R and S108N mutations were the most common, with a prevalence of 61.2% (156/255) and 55.7% (142/255), respectively; 12.2% (31/255) samples had also the dhfr N51I mutation while the I164L mutation was absent. The dhps A437G mutation was found in 34.2% (79/231) isolates, but none of them carried the codon K540E. The prevalence of the dhfr double mutations NRNI and the triple mutations IRNI was 35.7% (91/255) and 11.4% (29/255), respectively.

conclusionThough the mutations in the pfdhfr and pfdhps genes were relatively common, the prevalence of the triple pfdhfr mutation was very low, indicating that SP as IPTp is still efficacious in Burkina Faso.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAntimalarialsBurkina FasoDihydropteroate SynthaseDrug CombinationsDrug ResistanceFemaleHumansMalaria, FalciparumPlasmodium falciparumPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, SecondPregnancy Trimester, ThirdPrevalenceProtozoan ProteinsAntimalarialsDihydropteroate SynthaseDrug Combinationsfanasil, pyrimethamine drug combinationProtozoan ProteinsPyrimethamineSulfadoxineTetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID26368675
PMCPMC4569438
OpenAlexW2217179860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.