ReviewRNA biology2015
Identification of the Drosophila X chromosome: The long and short of it.
Review in RNA biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- ASAR lncRNAs control DNA replication timing through interactions with multiple hnRNP/RNA binding proteins.eLife · 2024Article
- Interaction of MLE with CLAMP zinc finger is involved in proper MSL proteins binding to chromosomes inOpen biology · 2024Article
- MALAT1 lncRNA and Parkinson's Disease: The role in the Pathophysiology and Significance for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches.Molecular neurobiology · 2022Review
- Valsartan Regulates PI3K/AKT Pathways through lncRNA GASL1 to Improve Isoproterenol-Induced Heart Failure.Disease markers · 2022Article
- Chromatin Structure and "DNA Sequence View": The Role of Satellite DNA in Ectopic Pairing of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Origins and Evolutionary Patterns of theG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Functional Significance of Satellite DNAs: Insights FromFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
- Gene-by-Gene or Localized Dosage Compensation on the Neo-X Chromosome in Drosophila miranda.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- The long noncoding RNA Malat1: Its physiological and pathophysiological functions.RNA biology · 2017Review
- Satellite Repeats Identify X Chromatin for Dosage Compensation in Drosophila melanogaster Males.Current biology : CB · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The different dose of X chromosomes in males and females produces a potentially fatal imbalance in X-linked gene products. This imbalance is addressed by dosage compensation, a process that modulates expression from an entire X chromosome in one sex. Dosage compensation acts on thousands of genes with disparate expression patterns. Both flies and mammals accomplish this with remarkable specificity by targeting epigenetic chromatin modifications to a single chromosome. Long noncoding RNAs that are expressed from the X chromosome are essential elements of the targeting mechanism in both lineages. We recently discovered that the siRNA pathway, as well as small RNA from satellite repeats that are strikingly enriched on the fly X chromosome, also promote X recognition. In this article we review the current understanding of X recognition in flies and discuss potential mechanisms by which the siRNA pathway, repetitive elements and long noncoding RNAs might cooperate to promote X recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.