Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2016
Outcome of patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who fail second-line salvage regimens in the International CORAL study.
Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
140 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 310 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Factors and Effect Modifiers in Patients With Relapse or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma After Two Lines of Therapy: A Systematic Literature and Expert Clinical Review.European journal of haematology · 2025Pooled it
- Loncastuximab Tesirine Versus Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL After ≥ 2 Lines of Therapy: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.Advances in therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is superior to standard of care as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of haematology · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Immunotherapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of ifupinostat in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter, single-arm phase 2 study.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Trial
- Semiquantitative PET Parameters Refine Prognosis in CAR T-Treated Lymphoma After 1 and 3 Months: A Prospective Single-Center Study.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and safety of epcoritamab in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: 3-year follow-up from the EPCORE NHL-3 trial.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Trial
- Atezolizumab, obinutuzumab and venetoclax for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory B non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Final analysis of a phase II trial from the LYSA group.British journal of haematology · 2025Trial
- Outcomes of subsequent antilymphoma therapies after second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel or standard of care in ZUMA-7.Blood advances · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Health-related quality of life with lisocabtagene maraleucel vs standard of care in relapsed or refractory LBCL.Blood advances · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Indirect comparison of tisagenlecleucel and historical treatments for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Blood advances · 2022Trial
- A randomized phase 2/3 study of R-CHOP vs CHOP combined with dose-dense rituximab for DLBCL: the JCOG0601 trial.Blood advances · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Phase II trial of co-administration of CD19- and CD20-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cells for relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma.Cancer medicine · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1-2 trial.The Lancet. Oncology · 2019Trial
- Outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients relapsing after autologous stem cell transplantation: an analysis of patients included in the CORAL study.Bone marrow transplantation · 2017Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of Lisocabtagene Maraleucel Versus Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Treatment for Large B Cell Lymphoma in the United States.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors at 14 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard second-line treatment for relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the strategy is less clear in patients who require third-line treatment. Updated outcomes of 203 patients who could not proceed to scheduled ASCT in the Collaborative Trial in Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma (CORAL) are herein reviewed. In the intent-to-treat analysis, overall response rate to third-line chemotherapy was 39%, with 27% CR or CR unconfirmed, and 12% PR. Among the 203 patients, 64 (31.5%) were eventually transplanted (ASCT 56, allogeneic SCT 8). Median overall survival (OS) of the entire population was 4.4 months. OS was significantly improved in patients with lower tertiary International Prognostic Index (IPI), patients responding to third-line treatment and patients transplanted with a 1-year OS of 41.6% compared with 16.3% for the not transplanted (P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, IPI at relapse (hazard ratio (HR) 2.409) and transplantation (HR 0.375) independently predicted OS. Third-line salvage chemotherapy can lead to response followed by transplantation and long-term survival in DLBCL patients. However, improvement of salvage efficacy is an urgent need with new drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.