Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26366787›Full record

ArticleGastrointestinal endoscopy2016

Factors influencing variation in physician adenoma detection rates: a theory-based approach for performance improvement.

Louise Atkins, Enid M Hunkeler, Christopher D Jensen, Susan Michie, Jeffrey K Lee, Chyke A Doubeni, Ann G Zauber, Theodore R Levin, Virginia P Quinn, Douglas A Corley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Implementing strategies to prevent infections in acute-care settings.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Louise AtkinsCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Enid M HunkelerDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California, USA.
Christopher D JensenDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California, USA.
Susan MichieCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jeffrey K LeeDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California, USA.
Chyke A DoubeniPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ann G ZauberDepartment of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Theodore R LevinDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California, USA.
Virginia P QuinnResearch and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA.
Douglas A CorleyDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Optimizing the use of colonoscopy for CRC screening in a large community-basedU54CA163262 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CORLEY, DOUGLAS ALLEN, DOUBENI, CHYKE ABADAMA · 2011 to 2017
$9.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsInterventions to improve physician adenoma detection rates for colonoscopy have generally not been successful, and there are little data on the factors contributing to variation that may be appropriate targets for intervention. We sought to identify factors that may influence variation in detection rates by using theory-based tools for understanding behavior.

methodsWe separately studied gastroenterologists and endoscopy nurses at 3 Kaiser Permanente Northern California medical centers to identify potentially modifiable factors relevant to physician adenoma detection rate variability by using structured group interviews (focus groups) and theory-based tools for understanding behavior and eliciting behavior change: the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation behavior model; the Theoretical Domains Framework; and the Behavior Change Wheel.

resultsNine factors potentially associated with adenoma detection rate variability were identified, including 6 related to capability (uncertainty about which types of polyps to remove, style of endoscopy team leadership, compromised ability to focus during an examination due to distractions, examination technique during withdrawal, difficulty detecting certain types of adenomas, and examiner fatigue and pain), 2 related to opportunity (perceived pressure due to the number of examinations expected per shift and social pressure to finish examinations before scheduled breaks or the end of a shift), and 1 related to motivation (valuing a meticulous examination as the top priority). Examples of potential intervention strategies are provided.

conclusionsBy using theory-based tools, this study identified several novel and potentially modifiable factors relating to capability, opportunity, and motivation that may contribute to adenoma detection rate variability and be appropriate targets for future intervention trials.

Indexed as

GastroenterologistsNursesQuality ImprovementAdenomaAttentionClinical CompetenceColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsFatigueFocus GroupsHumansMotivationPsychological TheorySocial EnvironmentWorkload

Identifiers

PMID26366787
PMCPMC4762744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.