Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26366557›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Clinical Validation of Targeted Next Generation Sequencing for Colon and Lung Cancers.

Nicky D'Haene, Marie Le Mercier, Nancy De Nève, Oriane Blanchard, Mélanie Delaunoy, Hakim El Housni, Barbara Dessars, Pierre Heimann, Myriam Remmelink, Pieter Demetter and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Significant clinical and radiologic response to targeted therapy in pediatric cervicomedullary low-grade gliomas harboring the BRAFV600E mutation.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicky D'HaeneDepartment of Pathology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Marie Le MercierDepartment of Pathology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Nancy De NèveDepartment of Pathology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Oriane BlanchardDepartment of Pathology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Mélanie DelaunoyDepartment of Genetics, Erasme Hospital,Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Hakim El HousniDepartment of Genetics, Erasme Hospital,Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Barbara DessarsDepartment of Genetics, Erasme Hospital,Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Pierre HeimannDepartment of Genetics, Erasme Hospital,Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Myriam RemmelinkDepartment of Pathology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Pieter DemetterDepartment of Pathology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Sabine TejparDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Isabelle SalmonDepartment of Pathology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecently, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has begun to supplant other technologies for gene mutation testing that is now required for targeted therapies. However, transfer of NGS technology to clinical daily practice requires validation.

methodsWe validated the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq Colon and Lung cancer panel interrogating 1850 hotspots in 22 genes using the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine. First, we used commercial reference standards that carry mutations at defined allelic frequency (AF). Then, 51 colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRC) and 39 non small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC) were retrospectively analyzed.

resultsSensitivity and accuracy for detecting variants at an AF >4% was 100% for commercial reference standards. Among the 90 cases, 89 (98.9%) were successfully sequenced. Among the 86 samples for which NGS and the reference test were both informative, 83 showed concordant results between NGS and the reference test; i.e. KRAS and BRAF for CRC and EGFR for NSCLC, with the 3 discordant cases each characterized by an AF <10%.

conclusionsOverall, the AmpliSeq colon/lung cancer panel was specific and sensitive for mutation analysis of gene panels and can be incorporated into clinical daily practice.

Indexed as

Gene FrequencyCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungColonic NeoplasmsDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA, NeoplasmFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasm ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, NeoplasmNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26366557
PMCPMC4569137
OpenAlexW2198945881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.