ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2015
Advancing pediatric psychiatry research: linking neurobiological processes to novel treatment and diagnosis through Research Domain Criteria (RDoC).
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stress, mental health and sociocultural adjustment in third culture kids: exploring the mediating roles of resilience and family functioning.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review.Human genomics · 2021Review
- Four Actionable Bottlenecks and Potential Solutions to Translating Psychiatric Genetics Research: An Expert Review.Public health genomics · 2020Review
- The Neurobiological Impact of Postpartum Maternal Depression: Prevention and Intervention Approaches.Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America · 2016Review
- Developmental Psychopathology and the Research Domain Criteria: Friend or Foe?Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.