Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26366319›Full record

ArticleMalaria research and treatment2015

Sustained Release Formulation of Primaquine for Prevention of Relapse of Plasmodium vivax Malaria: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative, Multicentric Study.

Anil Pareek, Nitin Chandurkar, Nithya Gogtay, Alaka Deshpande, Arjun Kakrani, Mala Kaneria, Partha Karmakar, Arvind Jain, Dhanpat Kochar, Arun Chogle and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria research and treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anil PareekMedical Affairs and Clinical Research, Ipca Laboratories Limited, Mumbai 400067, India.
Nitin ChandurkarClinical Research & Development, Ipca Laboratories Limited, Mumbai 400067, India.
Nithya GogtayDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth G. S. Medical College & K. E. M. Hospital, Mumbai 400012, India.
Alaka DeshpandeDepartment of Medicine, Grant Medical College & Sir J. J. Group of Hospitals, Mumbai 400008, India.
Arjun KakraniDepartment of Medicine, Padmashree Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Pimpri, Pune 411018, India.
Mala KaneriaDepartment of Medicine, B. Y. L. Nair Charitable Hospital & T. N. Medical College, Mumbai 400008, India.
Partha KarmakarDepartment of Medicine, IPGMER and SSKM College & Hospital, Kolkata 700020, India ; Department of Medicine, R. G. Kar Medical College & Hospital, 1 Kshudiram Bose Sarani, Kolkata 700004, India.
Arvind JainDepartment of Medicine, Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur 342003, India.
Dhanpat KocharKothari Medical and Research Institute, Bikaner 334004, India.
Arun ChogleKasturba Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Mumbai 400011, India.
Arnab RayDepartment of Medicine, IPGMER and SSKM College & Hospital, Kolkata 700020, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Primaquine is used to eradicate latent Plasmodium vivax parasite from liver, with administration of standard dose daily up to 14 days. We studied efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sustained release (SR) formulation of primaquine in comparison with conventional primaquine in preventing relapse of P. vivax malaria. Methods. Microscopically confirmed cases of P. vivax malaria received chloroquine therapy for three days. Aparasitemic and asymptomatic patients were then randomized to receive either conventional primaquine 15 mg for 14 days or primaquine SR 15 mg for 14 days, or primaquine SR 30 mg for seven days. Results. Of the 360 patients, who received chloroquine therapy, 358 patients were randomized. Two-hundred eighty-eight patients completed six-month follow-up and four patients (three: conventional primaquine 15 mg (2.86%), one: primaquine SR 30 mg (0.93%)) showed relapse confirmed by PCR genotyping. Drug compliance was significantly better in primaquine SR 30 mg group (95.57%, p = 0.039) without any serious adverse events. Conclusion. Primaquine SR 15 mg and primaquine SR 30 mg could be an effective alternative to conventional primaquine 15 mg due to their comparable cure rates and safety profile. Shorter treatment duration with primaquine SR 30 mg may increase patient compliance and may further reduce relapse rates. Clinical Trial Registration. This trial is registered with CTRI/2010/091/000245.

Identifiers

PMID26366319
PMCPMC4558454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.