Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26366286›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational immunology2015

Adoptive T-cell therapy for fungal infections in haematology patients.

Shivashni S Deo, David J Gottlieb

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transcriptional rewiring in CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. A New Method for Reactivating and Expanding T Cells Specific forMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2018
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. BioResearch open access · 2016
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Shivashni S DeoCentre for Cancer Research, Westmead Millennium Institute for Medical Research , Westmead, NSW, Australia ; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW, Australia.
David J GottliebCentre for Cancer Research, Westmead Millennium Institute for Medical Research , Westmead, NSW, Australia ; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW, Australia ; Blood and Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Haematology, Westmead Hospital , Westmead, NSW, Australia ; Sydney Cell and Gene Therapy Laboratory, Westmead Hospital , Westmead, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prolonged immune deficiency resulting from haematopoietic stem cell transplant and chemotherapy predisposes to a high risk of invasive fungal infections. Despite the recent advances in molecular diagnostic testing, early initiation of pre-emptive antifungal therapy and the use of combination pharmacotherapy, mortality from invasive mould infections remain high among recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplant. The increasing incidences of previously rare and drug-resistant strains of fungi present a further clinical challenge. Therefore, there is a need for novel strategies to combat fungal infections in the immunocompromised. Adoptive therapy using in vitro-expanded fungus-specific CD4 cells of the Th-1 type has shown clinical efficacy in murine studies and in a small human clinical study. Several techniques for the isolation and expansion of fungus-specific T cells have been successfully applied. Here we discuss the incidence and changing patterns of invasive fungal diseases, clinical evidence supporting the role of T cells in fungal immunity, methods to expand fungus-specific T cells in the laboratory and considerations surrounding the use of T cells for fungal immunotherapy.

Identifiers

PMID26366286
PMCPMC4558438
OpenAlexW2216827075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.