Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26366242›Full record

ArticleOntario health technology assessment series2015

Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Ontario: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

James M Bowen, Kaitryn Campbell, Simone Sutherland, Ann Bartlett, Dina Brooks, Riaz Qureshi, Roger Goldstein, Andrea S Gershon, Shelley Prevost, Lorelei Samis and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ontario health technology assessment series, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

James M BowenPrograms for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Kaitryn CampbellPrograms for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Simone SutherlandPrograms for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ann BartlettFirestone Institute for Respiratory Health, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and McMaster University School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Dina BrooksDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Toronto, and West Park Healthcare Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Riaz QureshiPrograms for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Roger GoldsteinDepartment of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine University of Toronto and West Park Healthcare Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea S GershonDivision of Respirology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shelley PrevostSt. Joseph's Hospital, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Lorelei SamisPhysiotherapy Department, Providence Care - St. Mary's of the Lake Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Alan G KaplanFamily Physician Airways Group of Canada and Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robert B HopkinsPrograms for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Craig MacDougaldPrograms for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Erica NunesPrograms for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Daria J O'ReillyPrograms for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ron GoereePrograms for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a comprehensive intervention of exercise training, education, and behaviour change to improve the physical and psychological condition of people with chronic respiratory disorders, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to promote long-term adherence to health-enhancing behaviours. Although PR is considered the standard of care for patients with COPD who remain symptomatic despite bronchodilator therapies, current evidence suggests that only 1.15% of COPD patients across Canada have access to PR facilities for care.

objectivesThe objectives of this study were to identify the number of health care facilities across Ontario providing PR services for patients with COPD, describe the scope of those services, and determine the province's current capacity to provide PR services relative to need, for the province as a whole and by local health integration network (LHIN).

methodsThe Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs in Ontario (PRO) Survey was a province-wide, descriptive, cross-sectional survey of health care facilities (hospitals, family health teams, and community health centres). It was distributed to 409 facilities to collect information on various aspects of PR services in the province.

resultsBetween April 2013 and February 2014, 187 facilities responded to the survey (46% response rate). Most responding centres (144) did not offer PR services, and only 43 were full PR sites providing a comprehensive program. Hospital-based programs made up the majority of sites offering full PR services (67%), followed by programs based at family health teams (19%) and community health centres (14%). More than 90% of PR programs are outpatient-based. The average wait time for outpatient PR was 6.9 weeks, and 58% of programs provide services 5 days per week. More than 80% of patients attending PR complete the full program. Across all program types, the total estimated provincial capacity for PR outpatient care is 4,524 patients per year, or 0.66% to 1.78% of patients with COPD, depending on the estimated prevalence of disease. LIMITATIONS: These results are representative of 12 of the 14 LHINs in Ontario due to low response rates in facilities in 2 LHINs.

conclusionsAlthough some increase in capacity has occurred since a similar survey in 2005, PR resources in Ontario are insufficient to support the delivery of care to people with COPD in accordance with clinical practice guideline recommendations.

Indexed as

Health ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityAmbulatory CareCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Care SurveysHumansOntarioPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Identifiers

PMID26366242
PMCPMC4561768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.