ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2015
Pre- and postmortem imaging of transplanted cells.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells Do Not Lose Direct Labels Including Iron Oxide Nanoparticles and DFO-Membranes · 2021Article
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Neurological Disorders.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Review
- Cadaveric Stem Cells: Their Research Potential and Limitations.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Comparative strategies for stem cell biodistribution in a preclinical study.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2020Article
- Labeling of human mesenchymal stem cells with different classes of vital stains: robustness and toxicity.Stem cell research & therapy · 2019Article
- Combined effects of rat Schwann cells and 17β-estradiol in a spinal cord injury model.Metabolic brain disease · 2018Article
- Hydrogel-based scaffolds to support intrathecal stem cell transplantation as a gateway to the spinal cord: clinical needs, biomaterials, and imaging technologies.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2018Review
- Labeling of mesenchymal stem cells for MRI with single-cell sensitivity.International journal of nanomedicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Therapeutic interventions based on the transplantation of stem and progenitor cells have garnered increasing interest. This interest is fueled by successful preclinical studies for indications in many diseases, including the cardiovascular, central nervous, and musculoskeletal system. Further progress in this field is contingent upon access to techniques that facilitate an unambiguous identification and characterization of grafted cells. Such methods are invaluable for optimization of cell delivery, improvement of cell survival, and assessment of the functional integration of grafted cells. Following is a focused overview of the currently available cell detection and tracking methodologies that covers the entire spectrum from pre- to postmortem cell identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.