Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26365999›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2015

The Prevention of Positioning Injuries during Gynecologic Operations. Guideline of DGGG (S1-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/077, February 2015).

M C Fleisch, D Bremerich, W Schulte-Mattler, A Tannen, A T Teichmann, W Bader, K Balzer, S P Renner, T Römer, S Roth and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03446950 (Candy Cane vs. Boot Stirrups in Vaginal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03446950 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Candy Cane vs. Boot Stirrups in Vaginal Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LouisvilleRan2018 to 2020Enrolled155ConditionsPhysical Activity, Surgery, Vaginal Hysterectomy, Vaginal SurgeryArmsVaginal Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Safe Practice of Female Genital Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

M C FleischUniversitäts-Frauenklinik Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf.
D BremerichKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main.
W Schulte-MattlerKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg.
A TannenInstitut für Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaften, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin.
A T TeichmannFrauenklinik, Klinikum Aschaffenburg, Aschaffenburg.
W BaderZentrum für Frauenheilkunde, Klinikum Bielefeld Mitte, Bielefeld.
K BalzerGefäß- und Endovaskulärchirurgie, GFO Kliniken Bonn, Betriebsstätte St. Marien, Bonn.
S P RennerUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen-Nürnberg, Frauenklinik, Erlangen.
T RömerKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Cologne.
S RothUrologische Klinik, Helios Klinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal.
F SchützAllgemeine Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg.
M ThillKlinik für Gynäkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main.
H TinnebergZentrum für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinium Gießen, Gießen.
K ZarrasAbteilung für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Minimalinvasive Chirurgie, Marienhospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

gynecologic operationspositioning injuriesprevention

Identifiers

PMID26365999
PMCPMC4554497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.