Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26365788›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2015

Short-term test-retest reliability of resting state fMRI metrics in children with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Krishna Somandepalli, Clare Kelly, Philip T Reiss, Xi-Nian Zuo, R C Craddock, Chao-Gan Yan, Eva Petkova, F X Castellanos, Michael P Milham, Adriana Di Martino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Krishna SomandepalliPhyllis Green and Randolph Cowen Institute for Pediatric Neuroscience, The Child Study Center at NYU Langone Medical Center, 1 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Clare KellyPhyllis Green and Randolph Cowen Institute for Pediatric Neuroscience, The Child Study Center at NYU Langone Medical Center, 1 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Philip T ReissDivision of Biostatistics, The Child Study Center at NYU Langone Medical Center, 1 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA; Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA.
Xi-Nian ZuoKey Laboratory of Behavioral Science and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
R C CraddockCenter for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, 445 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10022, USA; Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA.
Chao-Gan YanPhyllis Green and Randolph Cowen Institute for Pediatric Neuroscience, The Child Study Center at NYU Langone Medical Center, 1 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA; Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA; Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Eva PetkovaDivision of Biostatistics, The Child Study Center at NYU Langone Medical Center, 1 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA; Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA.
F X CastellanosPhyllis Green and Randolph Cowen Institute for Pediatric Neuroscience, The Child Study Center at NYU Langone Medical Center, 1 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA; Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA.
Michael P MilhamCenter for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, 445 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10022, USA; Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA.
Adriana Di MartinoPhyllis Green and Randolph Cowen Institute for Pediatric Neuroscience, The Child Study Center at NYU Langone Medical Center, 1 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA. Electronic address: dimara01@nyumc.org.

Funding

Longitudinal Discovery of Brain Developmental TrajectoriesU01MH099059 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI MILHAM, MICHAEL PETER · 2013 to 2017
$3.7M
Neural Dissection of Hyperactivity/Inattention in AutismR01HD065282 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CASTELLANOS, FRANCISCO XAVIER · 2009 to 2010
$2.3M
Neural Substrates of Variability in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHR01MH081218 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CASTELLANOS, FRANCISCO XAVIER · 2008 to 2010
$1.7M
Translational Developmental Neuroscience of AutismK23MH087770 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DI MARTINO, ADRIANA · 2010 to 2013
$644k
NICHD NIH HHS R01HD065282NIMH NIH HHS 5U01MH099059NIMH NIH HHS K23MH087770NIMH NIH HHS R01MH081218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, only one study has examined test-retest reliability of resting state fMRI (R-fMRI) in children, none in clinical developing groups. Here, we assessed short-term test-retest reliability in a sample of 46 children (11-17.9 years) with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and 57 typically developing children (TDC). Our primary test-retest reliability measure was the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), quantified for a range of R-fMRI metrics. We aimed to (1) survey reliability within and across diagnostic groups, and (2) compare voxel-wise ICC between groups. We found moderate-to-high ICC across all children and within groups, with higher-order functional networks showing greater ICC. Nearly all R-fMRI metrics exhibited significantly higher ICC in TDC than in children with ADHD for one or more regions. In particular, posterior cingulate and ventral precuneus exhibited group differences in ICC across multiple measures. In the context of overall moderate-to-high test-retest reliability in children, regional differences in ICC related to diagnostic groups likely reflect the underlying pathophysiology for ADHD. Our currently limited understanding of the factors contributing to inter- and intra-subject variability in ADHD underscores the need for large initiatives aimed at examining their impact on test-retest reliability in both clinical and developing populations.

Indexed as

Reproducibility of ResultsAdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBrainChildFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRadiographyADHDImage intraclass correlation coefficient (I2C2)Intraclass correlation coefficientResting state fMRITest–retest reliability

Identifiers

PMID26365788
PMCPMC6989828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.