ArticleThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2016
Protein microarrays identify disease-specific anti-cytokine autoantibody profiles in the landscape of immunodeficiency.
Article in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiplex Autoantibody Detection in Patients with Autoimmune Polyglandular Syndromes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Trial
- Antigen Microarray Reveals Broad and Subclinical Autoimmunity in Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity.Journal of clinical immunology · 2026Article
- Autoantibodies to Interferons in Infectious Diseases.Viruses · 2023Review
- Characterising the autoantibody repertoire in systemic sclerosis following myeloablative haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2023Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Methods for Detection of Antibodies against Type I Interferons in Patients with Endocrine Disorders.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Autoantibodies in immunodeficiency syndromes: The Janus faces of immune dysregulation.Blood reviews · 2022Review
- Autoantibodies against cytokines: phenocopies of primary immunodeficiencies?Human genetics · 2020Review
- Anticytokine autoantibodies leading to infection: early recognition, diagnosis and treatment options.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2019Review
- Article
- IL-6-specific autoantibodies among APECED and thymoma patients.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2016Article
- Anticytokine Autoantibodies: Association with Infection and Immune Dysregulation.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Review
- Smith-Magenis Syndrome Patients Often Display Antibody Deficiency but Not Other Immune Pathologies.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2016
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnti-cytokine autoantibodies (ACAAs) are pathogenic in a handful of rare immunodeficiencies. However, the prevalence and significance of other ACAAs across immunodeficiencies have not yet been described.
objectiveWe profiled ACAAs in a diverse cohort of serum samples from patients with immunodeficiency and assessed the sensitivity and specificity of protein microarrays for ACAA identification and discovery.
methodsHighly multiplexed protein microarrays were designed and fabricated. Blinded serum samples from a cohort of 58 immunodeficiency patients and healthy control subjects were used to probe microarrays. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was used to identify clusters of reactivity, and after unblinding, significance analysis of microarrays was used to identify disease-specific autoantibodies. A bead-based assay was used to validate protein microarray results. Blocking activity of serum containing ACAAs was measured in vitro.
resultsProtein microarrays were highly sensitive and specific for the detection of ACAAs in patients with autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type I and pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, detecting ACAA levels consistent with those reported in the published literature. Protein microarray results were validated by using an independent bead-based assay. To confirm the functional significance of these ACAAs, we tested and confirmed the blocking activity of select ACAAs in vitro.
conclusionProtein microarrays are a powerful tool for ACAA detection and discovery, and they hold promise as a diagnostic for the evaluation and monitoring of clinical immunodeficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.