ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2016
Is it worth carrying out determination of N-butane in postmortem samples? A case report and a comprehensive review of the literature.
Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hydrocarbon forensic chemistry: exploring multiple fronts-a minireview.Forensic sciences research · 2025Article
- Suicide after inhaling a pyrethrins containing insecticide spray.BMJ case reports · 2019Article
- Drug vaping applied to cannabis: Is "Cannavaping" a therapeutic alternative to marijuana?Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this article is to illustrate the importance of N-butane determination in postmortem samples through a case report and to propose actions and precautions to be taken into consideration when butane is suspected to be involved in cases of death. The case concerns a 15-year-old boy found dead after sniffing a cigarette lighter refill. Toxicological investigation revealed the presence of butane in the heart and femoral blood (1280 and 1170 μg/L, respectively), in the gastric contents (326 μg/L), and in the liver (1010 μg/kg) and lung tissues (210 μg/kg). Propane was present only in the blood samples at concentrations tenfolds lower.Butane can be involved in three kinds of fatalities: deliberate inhalations including volatile substance abuse (VSA), involuntary exposure, and homicides. A fatal outcome of butane inhalation can be caused by asphyxia and/or cardiac arrhythmia. In the context where butane exposure is evidenced by non-toxicological investigations, the usefulness of the determination of butane in postmortem samples is often questionable. However, it is admitted that butane-related deaths are generally underreported. Several difficulties including sample handling and storage, substantial variation in tissue concentrations, and lack of a lethal threshold make the interpretation of butane results challenging. In our opinion, systematic toxicological methods should be developed in order to analyze butane, at least when it concerns a typical VSA victim, even when butane is not actually suspected to be the cause of death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.