Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2016
Propofol and non-propofol based sedation for outpatient colonoscopy-prospective comparison of depth of sedation using an EEG based SEDLine monitor.
Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- No increased risk of perforation during colonoscopy in patients undergoing propofol versus traditional sedation: A meta-analysis.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2018Pooled it
- Comparison of the Jcerity endoscoper airway and the endotracheal tube in endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Anesthesia for Bronchoscopy-An Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Sedation for GI Endoscopy in the Morbidly Obese: Challenges and Possible Solutions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- General anesthesia and/or deep hypnotic state in propofol-based conscious sedation for endoscopy.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2024Article
- Sedation for Colonoscopy Procedures Using Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol-Fentanyl Infusions: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2024Article
- Article
- Increasing rates of general anesthesia use in lumpectomy procedures: A 15-year trends analysis.Journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Advances in Analgosedation and Periprocedural Care for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Endo-anesthesia: a primer.Gastroenterology report · 2022Review
- Recent Developments in Devices Used for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Sedation.Clinical endoscopy · 2021Review
- Propofol-Induced Severe Necrotizing Pancreatitis.ACG case reports journal · 2021Article
- High Incidence of Burst Suppression during Propofol Sedation for Outpatient Colonoscopy: Lessons Learned from Neuromonitoring.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2020Article
- Use of LMAⓇ GastroTM in esophagogastroduodenoscopy and endoscopy.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2019Article
- Big Sleep: Beyond Propofol Sedation During GI Endoscopy.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Article
- Replacement of dexmedetomidine loading with midazolam for sedation in elderly patients with spinal anesthesia.Medicine · 2018Article
- Reply to "State of the Art in Airway Management During GI Endoscopy: The Missing Pieces".Digestive diseases and sciences · 2017Article
- Clinical study of anesthetization by dezocine combined with propofol for indolent colonoscopy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Observational
- Providing Deep Sedation for Advanced Endoscopic Procedures: The Esthetics of Endoscopic Anesthetics.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2016Article
- Sedation in the Endoscopy Suite.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Propofol is a popular anesthetic sedative employed in colonoscopy. It is known to increase the patient satisfaction and improve throughput. However, there are concerns among the clinicians with regard to the depth of sedation, as a deeper degree of sedation is known to increase the incidence of aspiration and other adverse events. So we planned to compare the depth of sedation between propofol and non-propofol based sedation in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy, as measured by an electroencephalogram (EEG) based monitor SEDLine monitor (SedlineInc., San Diego, CA). The non-randomized prospective observational study was performed in the outpatient gastroenterology suite of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Patients included ASA class I-III aged more than 18 years scheduled for colonoscopy under Propofol or non-propofol based sedation. After an institutional review board approval, a written consent was obtained from prospective patients. Sedation (propofol or non-propofol based) was administered by either a certified nurse anesthetist under the supervision of an anesthesiologist (propofol) or a registered endoscopy nurse under the guidance of the endoscopist performing the procedure (non-propofol sedation). Depth of sedation was measured with an EEG based SEDLine monitor. The sedation providers were blinded to the patient state index-the indicator of depth of sedation. PSI (patient state index-SEDLine reading) was documented at colonoscope insertion, removal and at the return of verbal responsiveness after colonoscope withdrawal. Sedation spectrum was retrieved from the data stored on the SEDLine monitor. Patients sedated with propofol experience significantly deeper degrees of sedation at all times during the procedure. Additionally, during significant part of the procedure, they are at PSI levels associated with deep general anesthesia. The group that received propofol was more deeply sedated and had lower PSI values. Lighter propofol titration protocols may lead to improved patient care such as lowering risk of aspiration and hypotension. The role of processed EEG monitors such as the SEDLine monitor to improve sedation protocols remains to be determined. Trial registration We obtained an ethical clearance from the Institute. No trial registration was mandated, as no interventional drug or investigational device were used during the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.