Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26364180›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2016

Effectiveness of botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of de novo OAB symptoms following midurethral sling surgery.

Pawel Miotla, Konrad Futyma, Rufus Cartwright, Michal Bogusiewicz, Katarzyna Skorupska, Ewa Markut-Miotla, Tomasz Rechberger

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04807920 (Intravesical OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection at the Time of Prolapse Surgery for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04807920 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Intravesical OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection at the Time of Prolapse Surgery for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWalter Reed National Military Medical CenterRan2021 to 2023Enrolled138ConditionsUrinary Bladder, Overactive, Pelvic Organ ProlapseArmsOnabotulinumtoxinA 100 UNT, Injectable saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The evolution of incontinence into resolved, refractory andInvestigative and clinical urology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pawel Miotla2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954, Lublin, Poland. pmiotla@wp.pl.
Konrad Futyma2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954, Lublin, Poland.
Rufus CartwrightDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; Department of Urogynaecology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Michal Bogusiewicz2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954, Lublin, Poland.
Katarzyna Skorupska2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954, Lublin, Poland.
Ewa Markut-MiotlaDepartment of Paediatric Nursing, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Tomasz Rechberger2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954, Lublin, Poland.
Medical University of Lublin · PLImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisIntravesical onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) is effective for idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. Our primary objective was to compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA for women with de novo OAB after midurethral sling (MUS) surgery and women with idiopathic OAB.

methodsWomen enrolled in this prospective study had idiopathic (n = 53) or de novo (n = 49) OAB symptoms after MUS, with at least one episode of urgency urine incontinence per day. OnabotulinumtoxinA (100 U) was administered in 20 intradetrusor injections. Postvoid residual volumes were checked at 2, 4 and 12 weeks. Participants completed a 3-day bladder diary and the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) before and 12 weeks after treatment.

resultsAfter 12 weeks, 22 patients (41.5 %) in the idiopathic OAB and 19 patients (38.8 %) in the de novo OAB groups were completely dry. OnabotulinumtoxinA injections had a significant benefit within both groups (p <0.001) to decrease both the daily numbers of voids (-2.39 and -2.0) and incontinence episodes (-1.38 and -1.44), with no significant difference between groups. We observed an increase of mean voided volume of >90 ml in both groups. Urinary retention was observed in four patients.

conclusionsWe observed similar improvement in OAB symptoms after intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injections within both groups. The rates of retention and requirement for catheterization even for women with a prior MUS were acceptable. These observational data provide evidence that onabotulinumtoxinA can effectively treat patients with OAB following stress urinary incontinence surgery.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresAcetylcholine Release InhibitorsAdministration, IntravesicalAdultAgedBotulinum Toxins, Type AFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPelvic Organ ProlapsePostoperative ComplicationsSuburethral SlingsUrinary Bladder, OveractiveAcetylcholine Release InhibitorsBotulinum Toxins, Type ABotulinum toxinDe novo OABMidurethral slingOveractive bladderQuality of lifeUrgency incontinence

Identifiers

PMID26364180
PMCPMC4766229
OpenAlexW1866380676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.