Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26363412›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2015

An Open Conversation on Using Eye-Gaze Methods in Studies of Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Courtney E Venker, Sara T Kover

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Courtney E Venker
Sara T Kover

Funding

WISCONSIN CENTER ON MENTAL RETARDATION: CORE SUPPORTP30HD003352 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DAVIDSON, RICHARD J · 1985 to 2015
$25.2M
Characterizing Lexical Processing in Toddlers with Autism Spectrum DisordersR01DC012513 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI EDWARDS, JAN, ELLIS-WEISMER, SUSAN · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
Language and Learning in Boys with Fragile X SyndromeF31DC010959 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KOVER, SARA TERESA · 2010 to 2011
$57k
Statistical Word Learning and Non-Social Visual Attention in Children with AutismF31DC012451 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI VENKER, COURTNEY E · 2012 to 2012
$33k
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD003352NICHD NIH HHS P30HD003352NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC010959NIDCD NIH HHS F31DC010959NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC012451NIDCD NIH HHS F31DC012451NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012513NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC012513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEye-gaze methods have the potential to advance the study of neurodevelopmental disorders. Despite their increasing use, challenges arise in using these methods with individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders and in reporting sufficient methodological detail such that the resulting research is replicable and interpretable.

methodThis tutorial presents key considerations involved in designing and conducting eye-gaze studies for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders and proposes conventions for reporting the results of such studies.

resultsMethodological decisions (e.g., whether to use automated eye tracking or manual coding, implementing strategies to scaffold children's performance, defining valid trials) have cascading effects on the conclusions drawn from eye-gaze data. Research reports that include specific information about procedures, missing data, and selection of participants will facilitate interpretation and replication.

conclusionsEye-gaze methods provide exciting opportunities for studying neurodevelopmental disorders. Open discussion of the issues presented in this tutorial will improve the pace of productivity and the impact of advances in research on neurodevelopmental disorders.

Indexed as

Eye Movement MeasurementsEye MovementsNeurodevelopmental DisordersResearch DesignBiomedical ResearchChildHumansPattern Recognition, AutomatedPsychological TestsReproducibility of ResultsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26363412
PMCPMC4987028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.