ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2015
Bacterial CRISPR: accomplishments and prospects.
Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent developments in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing research for edible fungiculture.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Advances and Challenges in Mycobacterial Genetic Engineering: Techniques for Knockout, Knockdown and Overexpression.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Review
- A comprehensive review of genomic-scale genetic engineering as a strategy to improve bacterial productivity.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2025Review
- Dual-mode CRISPRa/i for genome-scale metabolic rewiring in Escherichia coli.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Real-Time PCR-Based Detection of Hepatitis E Virus in Groundwater: Primer Performance and Method Validation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The rise and future of CRISPR-based approaches for high-throughput genomics.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- CRISPR-Cas9-based genome-editing technologies in engineering bacteria for the production of plant-derived terpenoids.Engineering microbiology · 2024Review
- The Influence of Homologous Arm Length on Homologous Recombination Gene Editing Efficiency Mediated by SSB/CRISPR-Cas9 inMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- CRISPR/Cas9-based Genome Editing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Genome-wide promoter responses to CRISPR perturbations of regulators reveal regulatory networks in Escherichia coli.Nature communications · 2023Article
- A generalizable Cas9/sgRNA prediction model using machine transfer learning with small high-quality datasets.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- An overview of genome engineering in plants, including its scope, technologies, progress and grand challenges.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Review
- Development and applications of a CRISPR activation system for facile genetic overexpression in Candida albicans.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Development and application of CRISPR-based genetic tools in Bacillus species and Bacillus phages.Journal of applied microbiology · 2022Review
- Article
- Article
- Computational pipeline for designing guide RNAs for mismatch-CRISPRi.STAR protocols · 2021Article
- The next frontier of oncotherapy: accomplishing clinical translation of oncolytic bacteria through genetic engineering.Future microbiology · 2021Review
- Bacterial CRISPR screens for gene function.Current opinion in microbiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this review we briefly describe the development of CRISPR tools for genome editing and control of transcription in bacteria. We focus on the Type II CRISPR/Cas9 system, provide specific examples for use of the system, and highlight the advantages and disadvantages of CRISPR versus other techniques. We suggest potential strategies for combining CRISPR tools with high-throughput approaches to elucidate gene function in bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.