ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015
Expansion of the tetracycline-dependent regulation toolbox for Helicobacter pylori.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tet-ON and Tet-OFF regulation in hypervirulentMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Article
- Status quo of tet regulation in bacteria.Microbial biotechnology · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In an effort to gain greater understanding of the biology and infection processes of Helicobacter pylori, we have expanded the functionality of the tetracycline-dependent gene regulation (tet) system to provide more improved and versatile genetic control and facilitate the generation of conditional mutants to study essential genes. Second-generation tetracycline-responsive H. pylori uPtetO5 promoters were based on the mutated core ureA promoter. Single point mutations at either the ribosomal binding site or the start codon were introduced to shift the regulatory range of three uPtetO5 derivatives. All promoters were tested for regulation by TetR and revTetR using dapD, a gene essential to peptidoglycan biosynthesis, as a reporter. All tet promoters were effectively regulated by both TetR and revTetR, and their regulation windows overlapped so as to cover a broad range of expression levels. tet promoters uPtetO5m1 and uPtetO5m2 could be sufficiently silenced by both TetR and revTetR so that the conditional mutants could not grow in the absence of diaminopimelic acid (DAP). Furthermore, through the use of these inducible promoters, we reveal that insufficient DAP biosynthesis results in viable cells with altered morphology. Overall, the development and optimization of tet regulation for H. pylori will not only permit the study of essential genes but also facilitate investigations into gene dosage effects on H. pylori physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.