Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26362982›Full record

SynthesisApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Meta-analysis of the effects of sanitizing treatments on Salmonella, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Listeria monocytogenes inactivation in fresh produce.

Leonardo Prado-Silva, Vasco Cadavez, Ursula Gonzales-Barron, Ana Carolina B Rezende, Anderson S Sant'Ana

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. A Critical Review of Risk Assessment Models forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Virulence Factors of Enteric PathogenicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Organ-on-a-chip for assessing environmental toxicants.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Leonardo Prado-SilvaDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Food Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Vasco CadavezCIMO Mountain Research Centre, School of Agriculture (ESA), Polytechnic Institute of Braganza (IPB), Braganza, Portugal.
Ursula Gonzales-BarronCIMO Mountain Research Centre, School of Agriculture (ESA), Polytechnic Institute of Braganza (IPB), Braganza, Portugal.
Ana Carolina B RezendeDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Food Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Anderson S Sant'AnaDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Food Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil and@unicamp.br.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRPolytechnic Institute of Bragança · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the effects of sanitizing treatments of fresh produce on Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Listeria monocytogenes. From 55 primary studies found to report on such effects, 40 were selected based on specific criteria, leading to more than 1,000 data on mean log reductions of these three bacterial pathogens impairing the safety of fresh produce. Data were partitioned to build three meta-analytical models that could allow the assessment of differences in mean log reductions among pathogens, fresh produce, and sanitizers. Moderating variables assessed in the meta-analytical models included type of fresh produce, type of sanitizer, concentration, and treatment time and temperature. Further, a proposal was done to classify the sanitizers according to bactericidal efficacy by means of a meta-analytical dendrogram. The results indicated that both time and temperature significantly affected the mean log reductions of the sanitizing treatment (P < 0.0001). In general, sanitizer treatments led to lower mean log reductions when applied to leafy greens (for example, 0.68 log reductions [0.00 to 1.37] achieved in lettuce) compared to other, nonleafy vegetables (for example, 3.04 mean log reductions [2.32 to 3.76] obtained for carrots). Among the pathogens, E. coli O157:H7 was more resistant to ozone (1.6 mean log reductions), while L. monocytogenes and Salmonella presented high resistance to organic acids, such as citric acid, acetic acid, and lactic acid (∼3.0 mean log reductions). With regard to the sanitizers, it has been found that slightly acidic electrolyzed water, acidified sodium chlorite, and the gaseous chlorine dioxide clustered together, indicating that they possessed the strongest bactericidal effect. The results reported seem to be an important achievement for advancing the global understanding of the effectiveness of sanitizers for microbial safety of fresh produce.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyDisinfectantsEscherichia coli O157FruitListeria monocytogenesSalmonellaVegetablesDisinfectants

Identifiers

PMID26362982
PMCPMC4651082
OpenAlexW1888412991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.