ArticleGenetics2015
Termination of Replication Stress Signaling via Concerted Action of the Slx4 Scaffold and the PP4 Phosphatase.
Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Slx4 and Fun30/SMARCAD1 coordinate S-phase checkpoint regulation and replication fork protection in response to Top1-DNA crosslinks.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Opi1-mediated transcriptional modulation orchestrates genotoxic stress response in budding yeast.Genetics · 2023Article
- The Role of Chromatin Assembly Factors in Induced Mutagenesis at Low Levels of DNA Damage.Genes · 2023Article
- DNA damage checkpoint and repair: From the budding yeastComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Functional roles of protein phosphatase 4 in multiple aspects of cellular physiology: a friend and a foe.BMB reports · 2020Review
- Ser/Thr protein phosphatases in fungi: structure, regulation and function.Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2019Review
- Phosphorylation of Histone H4T80 Triggers DNA Damage Checkpoint Recovery.Molecular cell · 2018Article
- Mapping DNA damage-dependent genetic interactions in yeast via party mating and barcode fusion genetics.Molecular systems biology · 2018Article
- An interplay between multiple sirtuins promotes completion of DNA replication in cells with short telomeres.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- Article
- Slx4 scaffolding in homologous recombination and checkpoint control: lessons from yeast.Chromosoma · 2017Review
- Recovery from the DNA Replication Checkpoint.Genes · 2016Review
- The Rtt107 BRCT scaffold and its partner modification enzymes collaborate to promote replication.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2016Review
- Chromosome-wide histone deacetylation by sirtuins prevents hyperactivation of DNA damage-induced signaling upon replicative stress.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In response to replication stress, signaling mediated by DNA damage checkpoint kinases protects genome integrity. However, following repair or bypass of DNA lesions, checkpoint signaling needs to be terminated for continued cell cycle progression and proliferation. In budding yeast, the PP4 phosphatase has been shown to play a key role in preventing hyperactivation of the checkpoint kinase Rad53. In addition, we recently uncovered a phosphatase-independent mechanism for downregulating Rad53 in which the DNA repair scaffold Slx4 decreases engagement of the checkpoint adaptor Rad9 at DNA lesions. Here we reveal that proper termination of checkpoint signaling following the bypass of replication blocks imposed by alkylated DNA adducts requires the concerted action of these two fundamentally distinct mechanisms of checkpoint downregulation. Cells lacking both SLX4 and the PP4-subunit PPH3 display a synergistic increase in Rad53 signaling and are exquisitely sensitive to the DNA alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate, which induces replication blocks and extensive formation of chromosomal linkages due to template switching mechanisms required for fork bypass. Rad53 hypersignaling in these cells seems to converge to a strong repression of Mus81-Mms4, the endonuclease complex responsible for resolving chromosomal linkages, thus explaining the selective sensitivity of slx4Δ pph3Δ cells to alkylation damage. Our results support a model in which Slx4 acts locally to downregulate Rad53 activation following fork bypass, while PP4 acts on pools of active Rad53 that have diffused from the site of lesions. We propose that the proper spatial coordination of the Slx4 scaffold and PP4 action is crucial to allow timely activation of Mus81-Mms4 and, therefore, proper chromosome segregation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.