ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2016
Computational analysis of amoeboid swimming at low Reynolds number.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biophysical modeling identifies an optimal hybrid amoeboid-mesenchymal mechanism for maximal T cell migration speeds.Cell reports · 2026Article
- Biophysical modeling identifies an optimal hybrid amoeboid-mesenchymal mechanism for maximal T cell migration speeds.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Physical principles and mechanisms of cell migration.npj biological physics and mechanics · 2025Review
- Self-organization in amoeboid motility.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Amoeboid Swimming Is Propelled by Molecular Paddling in Lymphocytes.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Review
- Getting in shape and swimming: the role of cortical forces and membrane heterogeneity in eukaryotic cells.Journal of mathematical biology · 2018Article
- Analysis of a model microswimmer with applications to blebbing cells and mini-robots.Journal of mathematical biology · 2018Article
- Progress and perspectives in signal transduction, actin dynamics, and movement at the cell and tissue level: lessons fromInterface focus · 2016Review
- Eukaryotic Cell Dynamics from Crawlers to Swimmers.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent experimental work has shown that eukaryotic cells can swim in a fluid as well as crawl on a substrate. We investigate the swimming behavior of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae who swim by initiating traveling protrusions at the front that propagate rearward. In our model we prescribe the velocity at the surface of the swimming cell, and use techniques of complex analysis to develop 2D models that enable us to study the fluid-cell interaction. Shapes that approximate the protrusions used by Dictyostelium discoideum can be generated via the Schwarz-Christoffel transformation, and the boundary-value problem that results for swimmers in the Stokes flow regime is then reduced to an integral equation on the boundary of the unit disk. We analyze the swimming characteristics of several varieties of swimming Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae, and discuss how the slenderness of the cell body and the shapes of the protrusion effect the swimming of these cells. The results may provide guidance in designing low Reynolds number swimming models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26362281What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.