Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26362161›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2016

Comparison of Two Concentration Methods for the Molecular Detection of Enteroviruses in Raw and Treated Sewage.

F Hmaïed, S Jebri, M E R Saavedra, M Yahya, I Amri, F Lucena, M Hamdi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Detection and evaluation of rotavirus surveillance methods as viral indicator in the aquatic environments.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Molecular detection and genotyping of group A rotavirus in two wastewater treatment plants, Iran.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Monitoring human enteric viruses in wastewater and relevance to infections encountered in the clinical setting: a one-year experiment in central France, 2014 to 2015.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

F HmaïedUnité de Microbiologie et de Biologie Moléculaire, CNSTN, Technopôle de Sidi Thabet, 2020, Sidi Thabet, Tunisia. hmaiedfatma@yahoo.com.
S JebriUnité de Microbiologie et de Biologie Moléculaire, CNSTN, Technopôle de Sidi Thabet, 2020, Sidi Thabet, Tunisia.
M E R SaavedraDepartment of Microbiology, Barcelona University, Diagonal 645, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
M YahyaUnité de Microbiologie et de Biologie Moléculaire, CNSTN, Technopôle de Sidi Thabet, 2020, Sidi Thabet, Tunisia.
I AmriUnité de Microbiologie et de Biologie Moléculaire, CNSTN, Technopôle de Sidi Thabet, 2020, Sidi Thabet, Tunisia.
F LucenaDepartment of Microbiology, Barcelona University, Diagonal 645, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
M HamdiInstitut National Sciences Appliquées de Tunis, Laboratoire Ecologie Technologie Microbienne, Carthage University, BP 676, 1080, Tunis, Tunisia.
Centre National des Sciences et Technologies Nucléaires · TNUniversitat de Barcelona · ESInstitut National des Sciences Appliquées de Rennes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human enteric viruses are a major causative agent of emerging waterborne diseases and constitute a serious public health concern. Environmental contamination occurs through discharge of waste materials from infected persons. Methods for viral detection should be developed to detect low infective dose of enteric viruses in environment. In this study, we aimed at comparing two concentration methods for the detection of naturally occurring enteroviruses in raw and treated sewage. In the first method, polyethylene glycol is used to concentrate viral particles from the collected samples. The second method is based on ultracentrifugation of viral particles at high speed (110,000×g). Genomes of enteroviruses were quantified by the quantitative real-time PCR method in raw and treated sewage samples. PEG-based method yielded higher genomic copies of enteric viruses (with an average of 5.9 log10 genomic copies/100 mL) when applied to raw sewage samples. While the ultracentrifugation assay in the second method decreases genomic copies number (with an average of 5.4 log10 genomic copies/100 mL). The recovery differences between the two methods were not significant when applied to clean samples (treated sewage). This could be explained by the presence of inhibitors, which interfere with qRT-PCR, in less quantity comparatively to raw sewage. PEG-based method would be more accurate for samples with high-organic matter load. This report emphasizes the importance of matrices nature on the recovery of enteroviruses from sewage samples. This should be taken into consideration for establishing standardized virological assays to ensure the virological quality control of discharged water in environment.

Indexed as

Chemical PrecipitationEnterovirusHumansReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSewageUltracentrifugationViral LoadVirologySewage

Identifiers

PMID26362161
OpenAlexW1891717529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.