Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26362119›Full record

ArticlePlant signaling & behavior2016

Synergistic effect of Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ameliorates drought stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).

Manoj Kumar, Sankalp Mishra, Vijaykant Dixit, Manoj Kumar, Lalit Agarwal, Puneet Singh Chauhan, Chandra Shekhar Nautiyal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant signaling & behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Taxonomy ofmSystems · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Exopolysaccharide is required byFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manoj Kumara Division of Plant Microbe Interactions; CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg , Lucknow , India.
Sankalp Mishraa Division of Plant Microbe Interactions; CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg , Lucknow , India.
Vijaykant Dixita Division of Plant Microbe Interactions; CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg , Lucknow , India.
Manoj Kumara Division of Plant Microbe Interactions; CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg , Lucknow , India.
Lalit Agarwala Division of Plant Microbe Interactions; CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg , Lucknow , India.
Puneet Singh Chauhana Division of Plant Microbe Interactions; CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg , Lucknow , India.
Chandra Shekhar Nautiyala Division of Plant Microbe Interactions; CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg , Lucknow , India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) Pseudomonas putida NBRIRA and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NBRISN13 with ability to tolerate abiotic stress along with multiple PGP traits like ACC deaminase activity, minerals solubilisation, hormones production, biofilm formation, siderophore activity were evaluated for their synergistic effect to ameliorate drought stress in chickpea. Earlier we have reported both the strains individually for their PGP attributes and stress amelioration in host plants. The present study explains in detail the possibilities and benefits of utilizing these 2 PGPR in consortium for improving the chickpea growth under control and drought stressed condition. In vitro results clearly demonstrate that both the PGPR strains are compatible to each other and their synergistic growth enhances the PGP attributes. Greenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of inoculation of both strains individually and consortia in drought tolerant and sensitive cultivars (BG362 and P1003). The growth parameters were observed significantly higher in consortium as compared to individual PGPR. Colonization of both PGPR in chickpea rhizosphere has been visualized by using gfp labeling. Apart from growth parameters, defense enzymes, soil enzymes and microbial diversity were significantly modulated in individually PGPR and in consortia inoculated plants. Negative effects of drought stress has been ameliorated and apparently seen by higher biomass and reversal of stress indicators in chickpea cultivars treated with PGPR individually or in consortia. Findings from the present study demonstrate that synergistic application has better potential to improve plant growth promotion under drought stress conditions.

Indexed as

DroughtsBacillus amyloliquefaciensBiodiversityBiological AssayCarbonCicerPlant LeavesPrincipal Component AnalysisPseudomonas putidaRhizosphereCarbonbiofertilizersconsortiaPGPRrhizospheresynergism

Identifiers

PMID26362119
PMCPMC4871671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.