Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26361505›Full record

ReviewJournal of medicine and life2015

Recurrence after hepatic resection in colorectal cancer liver metastasis -Review article-.

B Lintoiu-Ursut, A Tulin, S Constantinoiu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medicine and life, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Radiofrequency Ablation for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Outcomes and Prognostic Factors Associated with Survival.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Molecular Imaging of Extracellular Tumor pH to Reveal Effects of Locoregional Therapy on Liver Cancer Microenvironment.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

B Lintoiu-Ursut"Prof. Dr. Agrippa Ionescu" Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
A TulinDepartment of Anatomy, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
S ConstantinoiuDepartment of General and Esophageal Surgery, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy; "Sf. Maria" Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outcomes and management of colorectal liver metastasis have undergone many changes. The incidence of recurrence after liver resection for hepatic metastasis remains very high. Liver resection, which provides the only curative treatment, is believed to have improved the long-term outcome of these patients. However, the management and outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastasis have greatly improved in the last decade, suggesting that the current use of aggressive multimodality treatments, including surgical resection combined with modern chemotherapeutic regimens, effectively prolong the life expectancy of these patients.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHepatectomyHumansLiver NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReoperationcolorectal cancerhepatic metastasisliver resection

Identifiers

PMID26361505
PMCPMC4564049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.