Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26361446›Full record

ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2015

Expedited Operative Care of Hip Fractures Results in Significantly Lower Cost of Treatment.

Kyle T Judd, Eric Christianson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Geriatric hip fracture with proximal upper extremity fracture increases morbidity and mortality.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Risk of Contralateral Hip Fracture Following Initial Hip Fracture Among Geriatric Fragility Fracture Patients.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Temporal Trends in Hip Fractures: How Has Time-to-Surgery Changed?The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The association between weight-bearing status and early complications in hip fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Prognostic factors of in-hospital complications after hip fracture surgery: a scoping review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyle T JuddSanford Orthopedics & Sports Medicine , Sioux Falls, SD, 57104.
Eric ChristiansonSanford School of Medicine at the University of South Dakota , Sioux Falls, SD 57104.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are an estimated 150,000 hip fractures per year in the United States, with estimated costs of care between $10.3 billion and $15.2 billion. With such high costs and an increasing burden of care, there has been interest in newer methods to increase efficiency of care. One such method is expedited fracture care, with earlier operative intervention. The purpose of this study was to determine if intervention within six hours of admission decreased costs with no change in the rate of major complications.

methodsA retrospective review of all patients age >65 undergoing operative intervention for a proximal femur fracture over a two year period were identified. Patients were divided into two groups: those undergoing operative intervention < six hours after admission (early) and those undergoing operative intervention > six hours after admission. Patient age, average length of stay, and complication rates were determined for the two groups.

resultsOur study identified 657 patients, 111 of which underwent early intervention with the remaining 546 undergoing late intervention. The average length of stay for the early intervention group was 4.11 days, compared to 5.68 days for die late intervention group (p=0.0005). There was a significant difference in average cost between the two groups. The average cost of the early intervention was $49,900, with the average cost of late intervention being $65,300 (p = 0.0086). There was no significant difference in incidence of major complications between the two groups.

conclusionPrograms emphasizing early intervention for hip fractures have the potential for large healthcare savings, with an average savings of $15,400. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Indexed as

Cost SavingsAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceCohort StudiesFemaleFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryFracture HealingHealth Care CostsHip FracturesHumansLength of StayMalePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID26361446
PMCPMC4492154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.