Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26361056›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Supersensitive detection and discrimination of enantiomers by dorsal olfactory receptors: evidence for hierarchical odour coding.

Takaaki Sato, Reiko Kobayakawa, Ko Kobayakawa, Makoto Emura, Shigeyoshi Itohara, Miwako Kizumi, Hiroshi Hamana, Akio Tsuboi, Junzo Hirono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A primacy code for odor identity.Nature communications · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Takaaki SatoBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Hyogo 661-0974, Japan.
Reiko KobayakawaInstitute of Biomedical Science, Kansai Medical University, Osaka 573-1010, Japan.
Ko KobayakawaInstitute of Biomedical Science, Kansai Medical University, Osaka 573-1010, Japan.
Makoto EmuraTakasago International Corporation, Kanagawa 254-0073, Japan.
Shigeyoshi ItoharaLaboratory for Behavioral Genetics, Brain Science Institute, RIKEN, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
Miwako KizumiBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Hyogo 661-0974, Japan.
Hiroshi HamanaBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Hyogo 661-0974, Japan.
Akio TsuboiResearch Institute of Frontier Medicine, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8521, Japan.
Junzo HironoBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Hyogo 661-0974, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enantiomeric pairs of mirror-image molecular structures are difficult to resolve by instrumental analyses. The human olfactory system, however, discriminates (-)-wine lactone from its (+)-form rapidly within seconds. To gain insight into receptor coding of enantiomers, we compared behavioural detection and discrimination thresholds of wild-type mice with those of ΔD mice in which all dorsal olfactory receptors are genetically ablated. Surprisingly, wild-type mice displayed an exquisite "supersensitivity" to enantiomeric pairs of wine lactones and carvones. They were capable of supersensitive discrimination of enantiomers, consistent with their high detection sensitivity. In contrast, ΔD mice showed selective major loss of sensitivity to the (+)-enantiomers. The resulting 10(8)-fold differential sensitivity of ΔD mice to (-)- vs. (+)-wine lactone matched that observed in humans. This suggests that humans lack highly sensitive orthologous dorsal receptors for the (+)-enantiomer, similarly to ΔD mice. Moreover, ΔD mice showed >10(10)-fold reductions in enantiomer discrimination sensitivity compared to wild-type mice. ΔD mice detected one or both of the (-)- and (+)-enantiomers over a wide concentration range, but were unable to discriminate them. This "enantiomer odour discrimination paradox" indicates that the most sensitive dorsal receptors play a critical role in hierarchical odour coding for enantiomer identification.

Indexed as

Discrimination, PsychologicalAnimalsCyclohexane MonoterpenesGene Knock-In TechniquesHumansLactonesMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMonoterpenesOdorantsOlfactory Receptor NeuronsStereoisomerismWinecarvoneCyclohexane MonoterpenesLactonesMonoterpenes

Identifiers

PMID26361056
PMCPMC4566093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.