Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26361051›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of psychology2016

Remembering Preservation in Hippocampal Amnesia.

Ian A Clark, Eleanor A Maguire

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The status of semantic memory in medial temporal lobe amnesia varies with demands on scene construction.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2020
    Article
  13. Sleeping with Hippocampal Damage.Current biology : CB · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Boundary extension is attenuated in patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex damage.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2018
    Article
  19. Differentiable Processing of Objects, Associations, and Scenes within the Hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ian A ClarkWellcome Trust Center for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom; email: ian.clark@ucl.ac.uk , e.maguire@ucl.ac.uk.
Eleanor A MaguireWellcome Trust Center for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom; email: ian.clark@ucl.ac.uk , e.maguire@ucl.ac.uk.
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0300117Medical Research Council G1002276Wellcome Trust 091593Wellcome Trust 101759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lesion-deficit model dominates neuropsychology. This is unsurprising given powerful demonstrations that focal brain lesions can affect specific aspects of cognition. Nowhere is this more evident than in patients with bilateral hippocampal damage. In the past 60 years, the amnesia and other impairments exhibited by these patients have helped to delineate the functions of the hippocampus and shape the field of memory. We do not question the value of this approach. However, less prominent are the cognitive processes that remain intact following hippocampal lesions. Here, we collate the piecemeal reports of preservation of function following focal bilateral hippocampal damage, highlighting a wealth of information often veiled by the field's focus on deficits. We consider how a systematic understanding of what is preserved as well as what is lost could add an important layer of precision to models of memory and the hippocampus.

Indexed as

AmnesiaHippocampusHumansdeficitshippocampusmemorynavigationneuropsychologyscene construction

Identifiers

PMID26361051
PMCPMC5360232
OpenAlexW1901166346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.