Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26360831›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Biofilm-Forming Abilities of Listeria monocytogenes Serotypes Isolated from Different Sources.

Swapnil P Doijad, Sukhadeo B Barbuddhe, Sandeep Garg, Krupali V Poharkar, Dewanand R Kalorey, Nitin V Kurkure, Deepak B Rawool, Trinad Chakraborty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antimicrobial Resistance Profile and Biofilm Formation ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Differences in Biofilm Formation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Natural Antimicrobials forMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Factors Influencing Biofilm Formation byFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Swapnil P DoijadICAR Research Complex for Goa, Old Goa 403 402, India.
Sukhadeo B BarbuddheICAR Research Complex for Goa, Old Goa 403 402, India; National Institute of Biotic Stress Management, IGKV Campus, Krishak Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492012, India.
Sandeep GargDepartment of Microbiology, Goa University, Taleigaon Plateau, Goa 403 206, India.
Krupali V PoharkarICAR Research Complex for Goa, Old Goa 403 402, India.
Dewanand R KaloreyDepartment of Microbiology and Animal Biotechnology, Nagpur Veterinary College, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur 440006, India.
Nitin V KurkureDepartment of Microbiology and Animal Biotechnology, Nagpur Veterinary College, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur 440006, India.
Deepak B RawoolDivision of Veterinary Public Health, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, 243122, India.
Trinad ChakrabortyInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Justus-Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A total of 98 previously characterized and serotyped L. monocytogenes strains, comprising 32 of 1/2a; 20 of 1/2b and 46 of 4b serotype, from clinical and food sources were studied for their capability to form a biofilm. The microtiter plate assay revealed 62 (63.26%) strains as weak, 27 (27.55%) strains as moderate, and 9 (9.18%) strains as strong biofilm formers. Among the strong biofilm formers, 6 strains were of serotype 1/2a and 3 strains were of serotype 1/2b. None of the strain from 4b serotype exhibited strong biofilm formation. No firm correlation (p = 0.015) was noticed between any serotype and respective biofilm formation ability. Electron microscopic studies showed that strong biofilm forming isolates could synthesize a biofilm within 24 h on surfaces important in food industries such as stainless steel, ceramic tiles, high-density polyethylene plastics, polyvinyl chloride pipes, and glass. Cell enumeration of strong, moderate, and weak biofilm was performed to determine if the number of cells correlated with the biofilm-forming capabilities of the isolates. Strong, moderate, and weak biofilm showed 570±127× 103 cells/cm2, 33±26× 103 cells/cm2, 5±3× 103 cells/cm2, respectively, indicating that the number of cells was directly proportional to the strength of the biofilm. The hydrophobicity index (HI) analysis revealed higher hydrophobicity with an increased biofilm formation. Fatty acid methyl esterase analysis revealed the amount of certain fatty acids such as iso-C15:0, anteiso-C15:0, and anteiso-C17:0 fatty acids correlated with the biofilm-forming capability of L. monocytogenes. This study showed that different strains of L. monocytogenes form biofilm of different intensities which did not completely correlate with their serotype; however, it correlated with the number of cells, hydrophobicity, and amount of certain fatty acids.

Indexed as

BiofilmsFatty AcidsListeria monocytogenesSerogroupFatty Acids

Identifiers

PMID26360831
PMCPMC4567129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.