Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26360240›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2015

Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study.

Ulla Sovio, Ian R White, Alison Dacey, Dharmintra Pasupathy, Gordon C S Smith

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 209 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
209citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
47.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03662178 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Investigating the Structured Use of Ultrasound Scanning for Fetal Growth (Oxford Growth Restriction Identification Programme (OxGRIP)) on Risk Factors for and the Incidences of Adverse Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Outcome

TypeobservationalSponsorOxford University Hospitals NHS TrustRan2017 to 2029Enrolled56,000ConditionsStillbirth, Fetal Death, Fetal Growth Retardation, Small for Gestational Age
NCT05043753 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Modena Policlinico Hospital Vial Del Pozzo 71, 41125 Modena

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled1,566ConditionsSmall for Gestational Age Infant, Large for Gestational Age Infant, Oligohydramnios, PolyhydramniosArmsPoint of care ultrasound to measure the fetal abdominal circumference (POC-US-AC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

209 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 590 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of maternal education on maternal and perinatal outcomes: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 2 356 402 pregnancies.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Guideline
  12. Guideline
  13. Perinatal outcomes after selective third-trimester ultrasound screening for small-for-gestational age: prospective cohort study nested within DESiGN randomized controlled trial.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

149 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ulla SovioDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK.
Ian R WhiteMedical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK.
Alison DaceyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK.
Dharmintra PasupathyDivision of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's Health Partners, King's College London, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Gordon C S SmithDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: gcss2@cam.ac.uk.
University of Cambridge · GBKing's College London · GBMedical Research Council · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105260558Medical Research Council U105260558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFetal growth restriction is a major determinant of adverse perinatal outcome. Screening procedures for fetal growth restriction need to identify small babies and then differentiate between those that are healthy and those that are pathologically small. We sought to determine the diagnostic effectiveness of universal ultrasonic fetal biometry in the third trimester as a screening test for small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants, and whether the risk of morbidity associated with being small differed in the presence or absence of ultrasonic markers of fetal growth restriction.

methodsThe Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study was a prospective cohort study of nulliparous women with a viable singleton pregnancy at the time of the dating ultrasound scan. Women participating had clinically indicated ultrasonography in the third trimester as per routine clinical care and these results were reported as usual (selective ultrasonography). Additionally, all participants had research ultrasonography, including fetal biometry at 28 and 36 weeks' gestational age. These results were not made available to participants or treating clinicians (universal ultrasonography). We regarded SGA as a birthweight of less than the 10th percentile for gestational age and screen positive for SGA an ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight of less than the 10th percentile for gestational age. Markers of fetal growth restriction included biometric ratios, utero-placental Doppler, and fetal growth velocity. We assessed outcomes for consenting participants who attended research scans and had a livebirth at the Rosie Hospital (Cambridge, UK) after the 28 weeks' research scan.

findingsBetween Jan 14, 2008, and July 31, 2012, 4512 women provided written informed consent of whom 3977 (88%) were eligible for analysis. Sensitivity for detection of SGA infants was 20% (95% CI 15-24; 69 of 352 fetuses) for selective ultrasonography and 57% (51-62; 199 of 352 fetuses) for universal ultrasonography (relative sensitivity 2·9, 95% CI 2·4-3·5, p<0·0001). Of the 3977 fetuses, 562 (14·1%) were identified by universal ultrasonography with an estimated fetal weight of less than the 10th percentile and were at an increased risk of neonatal morbidity (relative risk [RR] 1·60, 95% CI 1·22-2·09, p=0·0012). However, estimated fetal weight of less than the 10th percentile was only associated with the risk of neonatal morbidity (pinteraction=0·005) if the fetal abdominal circumference growth velocity was in the lowest decile (RR 3·9, 95% CI 1·9-8·1, p=0·0001). 172 (4%) of 3977 pregnancies had both an estimated fetal weight of less than the 10th percentile and abdominal circumference growth velocity in the lowest decile, and had a relative risk of delivering an SGA infant with neonatal morbidity of 17·6 (9·2-34·0, p<0·0001).

interpretationScreening of nulliparous women with universal third trimester fetal biometry roughly tripled detection of SGA infants. Combined analysis of fetal biometry and fetal growth velocity identified a subset of SGA fetuses that were at increased risk of neonatal morbidity.

fundingNational Institute for Health Research, Medical Research Council, Sands, and GE Healthcare.

Indexed as

Gestational AgePregnancy OutcomeAdultBiometryCohort StudiesFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeMaleParityPlacentaPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26360240
PMCPMC4655320
OpenAlexW2178653331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.