ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
REACH of Interventions Integrating Primary Care and Behavioral Health.
Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Integrated, Evidence-Guided Framework for Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management: Behavioral Mechanisms, Implementation Strategies, and Real-World Application.Kidney & blood pressure research · 2026Review
- Evaluating the follow-up care system after suicide attempt in Iran: barriers and insights from a mixed-method study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Characterizing primary care patient referrals and attendance patterns for virtual lifestyle medicine shared medical appointments.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Using the Healthy Native Youth Implementation Toolbox to Provide Web-Based Adolescent Health Promotion Decision Support to American Indian and Alaska Native Communities: Implementation Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Dissemination of a telehealth cardiovascular risk service: The CVRS live protocol.Contemporary clinical trials · 2021Article
- Costs of using evidence-based implementation strategies for behavioral health integration in a large primary care system.Health services research · 2020Article
- Treatment of depression and PTSD in primary care clinics serving uninsured low-income mostly Latina/o immigrants: A naturalistic prospective evaluation.Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology · 2019Article
- Team-Based Care with Pharmacists to Improve Blood Pressure: a Review of Recent Literature.Current hypertension reports · 2018Review
- Understanding Care Integration from the Ground Up: Five Organizing Constructs that Shape Integrated Practices.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
- Clinical Workflows and the Associated Tasks and Behaviors to Support Delivery of Integrated Behavioral Health and Primary Care.The Journal of ambulatory care managementArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study reports REACH (the extent to which an intervention or program was delivered to the identified target population) of interventions integrating primary care and behavioral health implemented by real-world practices.
methodsEleven practices implementing integrated care interventions provided data to calculate REACH as follows: 1) Screening REACH defined as proportion of target patients assessed for integrated care, and 2) Integrated care services REACH-defined as proportion of patients receiving integrated services of those who met specific criteria. Difference in mean REACH between practices was evaluated using t test.
resultsOverall, 26.2% of target patients (n = 24,906) were assessed for integrated care and 41% (n = 836) of eligible patients received integration services. Practices that implemented systematic protocols to identify patients needing integrated care had a significantly higher screening REACH (mean, 70%; 95% CI [confidence interval], 46.6-93.4%) compared with practices that used clinicians' discretion (mean, 7.9%; 95% CI, 0.6-15.1; P = .0014). Integrated care services REACH was higher among practices that used clinicians' discretion compared with those that assessed patients systematically (mean, 95.8 vs 53.8%; P = .03).
conclusionREACH of integrated care interventions differed by practices' method of assessing patients. Measuring REACH is important to evaluate the extent to which integration efforts affect patient care and can help demonstrate the impact of integrated care to payers and policy makers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.