Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26359354›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts prostatic carcinoma in men undergoing needle biopsy.

Takashi Kawahara, Sachi Fukui, Kentaro Sakamaki, Yusuke Ito, Hiroki Ito, Naohito Kobayashi, Koji Izumi, Yumiko Yokomizo, Yasuhide Miyoshi, Kazuhide Makiyama and 5 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Takashi KawaharaDepartment of Urology, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Sachi FukuiDepartment of Urology, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Kentaro SakamakiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yusuke ItoDepartment of Urology, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Hiroki ItoDepartment of Urology, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Naohito KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Koji IzumiDepartment of Urology, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yumiko YokomizoDepartment of Urology, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yasuhide MiyoshiDepartments of Urology and Renal Transportation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Kazuhide MakiyamaDepartment of Urology, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Noboru NakaigawaDepartment of Urology, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Takeharu YamanakaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Masahiro YaoDepartment of Urology, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Hiroshi MiyamotoDepartments of Pathology and Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Hiroji UemuraDepartment of Urology, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a simple marker of systemic inflammatory response, has been demonstrated as an independent prognosticator for some solid malignancies, including prostate cancer. In the present study, we evaluated the role of NLR in men who underwent prostate needle biopsy for their initial diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma. Both complete blood counts and free/total (F/T) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio were examined in a total of 3,011 men in our institution. Of these, 1,207 had a PSA level between 4 and 10 ng/mL, and 357 of 810 who subsequently underwent prostate needle biopsy were found to have prostatic adenocarcinoma. NLR value was significantly higher in men with PSA of ≥ 20 ng/mL than in those with PSA of < 20 ng/mL (p < 0.001). NLR was also significantly higher in men with positive biopsy than in those with negative biopsy (p < 0.001). Using NLR cut-off point of 2.40 determined by the AUROC curve, positive/negative predictive values of NLR alone and NLR combined with F/T PSA ratio (cut-off: 0.15) were 56.6%/60.8% and 80.7%/60.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that not only F/T PSA ratio (HR = 3.13) but also NLR (HR = 2.21) was an independent risk factor for prostate cancer. NLR is thus likely elevated in patients with prostate cancer. Accordingly, NLR, with or without combination with F/T PSA ratio, may function as a new biomarker to predict prostate cancer in men undergoing prostate needle biopsy.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsy, NeedleHumansKallikreinsLymphocyte CountLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeutrophilsPredictive Value of TestsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanProstate-Specific AntigenbiomarkerClinical Sectionneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioprostate cancerprostate needle biopsy

Identifiers

PMID26359354
PMCPMC4741667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.