Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26359209›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology2016

Strategies to improve delivery of anticancer drugs across the blood-brain barrier to treat glioblastoma.

Rajneet K Oberoi, Karen E Parrish, Terence T Sio, Rajendar K Mittapalli, William F Elmquist, Jann N Sarkaria

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 274 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Association BetweenCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Pooled it
  4. The effect of an adenosine AFluids and barriers of the CNS · 2018
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Nano-Based Technology in Glioblastoma.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rajneet K OberoiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (R.K.O., K.E.P., R.K.M., W.F.E.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.T.S., J.N.S.).
Karen E ParrishDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (R.K.O., K.E.P., R.K.M., W.F.E.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.T.S., J.N.S.).
Terence T SioDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (R.K.O., K.E.P., R.K.M., W.F.E.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.T.S., J.N.S.).
Rajendar K MittapalliDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (R.K.O., K.E.P., R.K.M., W.F.E.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.T.S., J.N.S.).
William F ElmquistDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (R.K.O., K.E.P., R.K.M., W.F.E.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.T.S., J.N.S.).
Jann N SarkariaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (R.K.O., K.E.P., R.K.M., W.F.E.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (T.T.S., J.N.S.).
Mayo Clinic · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Jeffrey S. Miller · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a lethal and aggressive brain tumor that is resistant to conventional radiation and cytotoxic chemotherapies. Molecularly targeted agents hold great promise in treating these genetically heterogeneous tumors, yet have produced disappointing results. One reason for the clinical failure of these novel therapies can be the inability of the drugs to achieve effective concentrations in the invasive regions beyond the bulk tumor. In this review, we describe the influence of the blood-brain barrier on the distribution of anticancer drugs to both the tumor core and infiltrative regions of GBM. We further describe potential strategies to overcome these drug delivery limitations. Understanding the key factors that limit drug delivery into brain tumors will guide future development of approaches for enhanced delivery of effective drugs to GBM.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBlood-Brain BarrierBrain NeoplasmsDrug Delivery SystemsGlioblastomaHumansAntineoplastic Agentsblood-brain barrierdrug deliveryefflux transportersglioma

Identifiers

PMID26359209
PMCPMC4677418
OpenAlexW2202001486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.