Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26359148›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2015

Optimal Diagnostic Indices for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Based on the 3D Quantitative Volumetric Analysis for the Cerebral Ventricle and Subarachnoid Space.

S Yamada, M Ishikawa, K Yamamoto

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07285928 (Contribution of Cerebral Pulsatility Assessment by Transcranial Ultrasound to the Decision-making for Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunting in Patients With Suspected Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07285928 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Contribution of Cerebral Pulsatility Assessment by Transcranial Ultrasound to the Decision-making for Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunting in Patients With Suspected Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: a Prospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, ToursRan2026 to 2029Enrolled110ConditionsBrain Pulsatility, Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (INPH)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S YamadaFrom the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Center (S.Y., M.I.) Department of Neurosurgery and Stroke Center (S.Y., M.I., K.Y.), Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. shigekiyamada3@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7158-5569
M IshikawaFrom the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Center (S.Y., M.I.) Department of Neurosurgery and Stroke Center (S.Y., M.I., K.Y.), Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
K YamamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery and Stroke Center (S.Y., M.I., K.Y.), Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3983-6916

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeDespite the remarkable progress of 3D graphics technology, the Evans index has been the most popular index for ventricular enlargement. We investigated a novel reliable index for the MR imaging features specified in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, rather than the Evans index. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe patients with suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus on the basis of the ventriculomegaly and a triad of symptoms underwent the CSF tap test. CSF volumes were extracted from a T2-weighted 3D spin-echo sequence named "sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions (SPACE)" on 3T MR imaging and were quantified semiautomatically. Subarachnoid spaces were divided as follows: upper and lower parts and 4 compartments of frontal convexity, parietal convexity, Sylvian fissure and basal cistern, and posterior fossa. The maximum length of 3 axial directions in the bilateral ventricles and their frontal horns was measured. The "z-Evans Index" was defined as the maximum z-axial length of the frontal horns to the maximum cranial z-axial length. These parameters were evaluated for the predictive accuracy for the tap-positive groups compared with the tap-negative groups and age-adjusted odds ratios at the optimal thresholds.

resultsIn this study, 24 patients with tap-positive idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, 25 patients without response to the tap test, and 23 age-matched controls were included. The frontal horns of the bilateral ventricles were expanded, with the most excessive expansion being toward the z-direction. The CSF volume of the parietal convexity had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.768), the z-Evans Index was the second (0.758), and the upper-to-lower subarachnoid space ratio index was the third (0.723), to discriminate the tap-test response.

conclusionsThe CSF volume of the parietal convexity of <38 mL, upper-to-lower subarachnoid space ratio of <0.33, and the z-Evans Index of >0.42 were newly proposed useful indices for the idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus diagnosis, an alternative to the Evans Index.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansHydrocephalus, Normal PressureImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID26359148
PMCPMC7964275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.