ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2015
Mammography screening is harmful and should be abandoned.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cracking the code: Pioneering early detection and management of breast cancer in the Brazilian public healthcare system.Dialogues in health · 2025Review
- In Search of Ideal Solutions for Cancer Diagnosis: From Conventional Methods to Protein Biomarkers in Liquid Biopsy.Proteomes · 2025Review
- Unlocking insights: exploring mammography beliefs among Teshie community mothers - a qualitative exploratory descriptive study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Effect of X-Ray Energy on the Quantitative Yield of γH2AX and 53BP1 Foci in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Missing the person: Are preventive medicine and clinical practice guidelines contributing to physician burnout?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024Article
- Article
- Is the development of liquid biopsy for the early detection and the monitoring of breast cancers on its way of overtaking mammography?Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Screening Programs for Breast Cancer: Toward Individualized, Risk-Adapted Strategies of Early Detection.Cancer treatment and research · 2023Article
- Intra-urban spatial variability of breast and cervical cancer mortality in the city of São Paulo: analysis of associated factors.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- A modified source-detector configuration for the discrimination between normal and diseased human breast based on the continuous-wave diffuse optical imaging approach: a simulation study.Lasers in medical science · 2022Article
- Changing Trends in the Proportional Incidence and Five-year Net Survival of Screened and Non-screened Breast Cancers among Women During 1995-2011 in England.Journal of clinical and translational pathology · 2022Article
- The current status of risk-stratified breast screening.British journal of cancer · 2022Review
- Applying artificial intelligence technology to assist with breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2021Article
- [Digital interventions in prevention and health promotion: What kind of evidence do we have and what is needed?]Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2020Review
- Spatial pattern of mortality from breast and cervical cancer in the city of São Paulo.Revista de saude publica · 2020Article
- The discordance between evidence and health policy in the United States: the science of translational research and the critical role of diverse stakeholders.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- Article
- Preliminary Results of a New Auxiliary Mechatronic Near-Field Radar System to 3D Mammography for Early Detection of Breast Cancer.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.