Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26358804›Full record

ReviewSeminars in perinatology2015

Epidemiology of medications use in pregnancy.

Martina Ayad, Maged M Costantine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in perinatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Mechanisms of altered hepatic drug disposition during pregnancy: small molecules.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martina AyadDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555-0587.
Maged M CostantineDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555-0587. Electronic address: mmcostan@utmb.edu.

Funding

UTMB OPRC Administrative CoreU54HD047891 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI DUKES, KIMBERLY A. · 2015 to 2019
$4.8M
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD047891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of prescribed and over-the-counter medications in pregnancy is on the rise. Many women become pregnant at an older age and with preexisting medical conditions that require pharmacotherapy. In addition, pregnancy is associated with profound changes in the physiology of virtually every organ in the body, which affect medications' pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Despite all of these, pregnant women are still considered therapeutic orphans, as the majority of current therapeutics were never studied in pregnancy. The goals of this review are to synthesize the available information regarding the epidemiology of medications use and the state of drug research in pregnancy, in an effort to highlight the need for pharmacologic research in pregnancy.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalDrug IndustryPregnant PeopleAdultClinical Trials as TopicComorbidityDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Information ServicesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfant, NewbornPatient SelectionPolypharmacyPregnancyPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID26358804
PMCPMC4628584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.