Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26358798›Full record

GuidelineJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2015

Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma, Version 2.2015.

Robert I Haddad, William M Lydiatt, Douglas W Ball, Naifa Lamki Busaidy, David Byrd, Glenda Callender, Paxton Dickson, Quan-Yang Duh, Hormoz Ehya, Megan Haymart and 20 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Novel Scoring System for AUS Thyroid Nodule.International journal of endocrinology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Robert I Haddad
William M Lydiatt
Douglas W Ball
Naifa Lamki Busaidy
David Byrd
Glenda Callender
Paxton Dickson
Quan-Yang Duh
Hormoz Ehya
Megan Haymart
Carl Hoh
Jason P Hunt
Andrei Iagaru
Fouad Kandeel
Peter Kopp
Dominick M Lamonica
Judith C McCaffrey
Jeffrey F Moley
Lee Parks
Christopher D Raeburn
John A Ridge
Matthew D Ringel
Randall P Scheri
Jatin P Shah
Robert C Smallridge
Cord Sturgeon
Thomas N Wang
Lori J Wirth
Karin G Hoffmann
Miranda Hughes

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Thyroid Carcinoma focuses on anaplastic carcinoma because substantial changes were made to the systemic therapy recommendations for the 2015 update. Dosages and frequency of administration are now provided, docetaxel/doxorubicin regimens were added, and single-agent cisplatin was deleted because it is not recommended for patients with advanced or metastatic anaplastic thyroid cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinDocetaxelDoxorubicinHumansPaclitaxelRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedTaxoidsThyroid Carcinoma, AnaplasticThyroidectomyThyroid NeoplasmsCarboplatinDocetaxelDoxorubicinPaclitaxelTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID26358798
PMCPMC4986600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.