Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26358618›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2016

Optimization of next-generation sequencing transcriptome annotation for species lacking sequenced genomes.

Nina F Ockendon, Lauren A O'Connell, Stephen J Bush, Jimena Monzón-Sandoval, Holly Barnes, Tamás Székely, Hans A Hofmann, Steve Dorus, Araxi O Urrutia

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Data on theData in brief · 2020
    Article
  7. CAARS: comparative assembly and annotation of RNA-Seq data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neural Circuits Underlying Rodent Sociality: A Comparative Approach.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nina F OckendonDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Lauren A O'ConnellFAS Centre for Systems Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
Stephen J BushDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Jimena Monzón-SandovalDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Holly BarnesDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Tamás SzékelyDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Hans A HofmannCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Steve DorusDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA.
Araxi O UrrutiaDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
University of Bath · GBCenter for Systems Biology · USSyracuse University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing methods, such as RNA-seq, have permitted the exploration of gene expression in a range of organisms which have been studied in ecological contexts but lack a sequenced genome. However, the efficacy and accuracy of RNA-seq annotation methods using reference genomes from related species have yet to be robustly characterized. Here we conduct a comprehensive power analysis employing RNA-seq data from Drosophila melanogaster in conjunction with 11 additional genomes from related Drosophila species to compare annotation methods and quantify the impact of evolutionary divergence between transcriptome and the reference genome. Our analyses demonstrate that, regardless of the level of sequence divergence, direct genome mapping (DGM), where transcript short reads are aligned directly to the reference genome, significantly outperforms the widely used de novo and guided assembly-based methods in both the quantity and accuracy of gene detection. Our analysis also reveals that DGM recovers a more representative profile of Gene Ontology functional categories, which are often used to interpret emergent patterns in genomewide expression analyses. Lastly, analysis of available primate RNA-seq data demonstrates the applicability of our observations across diverse taxa. Our quantification of annotation accuracy and reduced gene detection associated with sequence divergence thus provides empirically derived guidelines for the design of future gene expression studies in species without sequenced genomes.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingTranscriptomeAnimalsDrosophilaMolecular Sequence AnnotationPrimatesDrosophilagene ontologynonmodel speciesprimateRNA-seqtranscriptome assembly

Identifiers

PMID26358618
PMCPMC4982090
OpenAlexW2106114901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.