Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26358297›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2015

Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in pigs using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing.

Minkyeung Choi, Jongin Lee, Min Thong Le, Dinh Truong Nguyen, Suhyun Park, Nagasundarapandian Soundrarajan, Kyle M Schachtschneider, Jaebum Kim, Jin-Ki Park, Jin-Hoi Kim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Generating Sequencing-Based DNA Methylation Maps from Low DNA Input Samples.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Minkyeung ChoiDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-701, Korea.
Jongin LeeDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-701, Korea.
Min Thong LeDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-701, Korea.
Dinh Truong NguyenDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-701, Korea.
Suhyun ParkDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-701, Korea.
Nagasundarapandian SoundrarajanDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-701, Korea.
Kyle M SchachtschneiderDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA Animal Breeding and Genomics Center, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jaebum KimDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-701, Korea.
Jin-Ki ParkAnimal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Suwon, Korea.
Jin-Hoi KimDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-701, Korea.
Chankyu ParkDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-701, Korea chankyu@konkuk.ac.kr.
Konkuk University · KRNational Institute of Animal Science · KRWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation plays a major role in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Although a few DNA methylation profiling studies of porcine genome which is one of the important biomedical models for human diseases have been reported, the available data are still limited. We tried to study methylation patterns of diverse pig tissues as a study of the International Swine Methylome Consortium to generate the swine reference methylome map to extensively evaluate the methylation profile of the pig genome at a single base resolution. We generated and analysed the DNA methylome profiles of five different tissues and a cell line originated from pig. On average, 39.85 and 62.1% of cytosine and guanine dinucleotides (CpGs) of CpG islands and 2 kb upstream of transcription start sites were covered, respectively. We detected a low rate (an average of 1.67%) of non-CpG methylation in the six samples except for the neocortex (2.3%). The observed global CpG methylation patterns of pigs indicated high similarity to other mammals including humans. The percentage of CpG methylation associated with gene features was similar among the tissues but not for a 3D4/2 cell line. Our results provide essential information for future studies of the porcine epigenome.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticGenomeSequence Analysis, DNAAnimalsCpG IslandsHumansLiverMusclesNeocortexOlfactory MucosaOrgan SpecificitySpleenSulfitesSus scrofahydrogen sulfiteSulfitesDNA methylationepigeneticsmethylomepigRRBS

Identifiers

PMID26358297
PMCPMC4596400
OpenAlexW2109340786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.