Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26358114›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2015

Genome instability model of metastatic neuroblastoma tumorigenesis by a dictionary learning algorithm.

Salvatore Masecchia, Simona Coco, Annalisa Barla, Alessandro Verri, Gian Paolo Tonini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. An overview of neuroblastoma cell lineage phenotypes andExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  4. Telomere Maintenance in Pediatric Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  5. Neuroblastoma by chance.Journal of Cancer · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Salvatore MasecchiaDIBRIS, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy. salvatore.masecchia@disi.unige.it.
Simona CocoLung Cancer Unit; IRCCS A.O.U. San Martino - IST, Genova, Italy. simona.coco@hsanmartino.it.
Annalisa BarlaDIBRIS, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy. annalisa.barla@unige.it.
Alessandro VerriDIBRIS, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy. verri@disi.unige.it.
Gian Paolo ToniniNeuroblastoma Laboratory, Onco/Hematology Laboratory, Department of Woman and Child Health, University of Padua, Pediatric Research Institute, Fondazione Città della Speranza, Padua, Corso Stati Uniti, 4, 35127, Padua, Italy. gp.tonini@irpcds.org.
University of Genoa · ITCittà della Speranza Foundation · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic neuroblastoma (NB) occurs in pediatric patients as stage 4S or stage 4 and it is characterized by heterogeneous clinical behavior associated with diverse genotypes. Tumors of stage 4 contain several structural copy number aberrations (CNAs) rarely found in stage 4S. To date, the NB tumorigenesis is not still elucidated, although it is evident that genomic instability plays a critical role in the genesis of the tumor. Here we propose a mathematical approach to decipher genomic data and we provide a new model of NB metastatic tumorigenesis.

methodWe elucidate NB tumorigenesis using Enhanced Fused Lasso Latent Feature Model (E-FLLat) modeling the array comparative chromosome hybridization (aCGH) data of 190 metastatic NBs (63 stage 4S and 127 stage 4). This model for aCGH segmentation, based on the minimization of functional dictionary learning (DL), combines several penalties tailored to the specificities of aCGH data. In DL, the original signal is approximated by a linear weighted combination of atoms: the elements of the learned dictionary.

resultsThe hierarchical structures for stage 4S shows at the first level of the oncogenetic tree several whole chromosome gains except to the unbalanced gains of 17q, 2p and 2q. Conversely, the high CNA complexity found in stage 4 tumors, requires two different trees. Both stage 4 oncogenetic trees are marked diverged, up to five sublevels and the 17q gain is the most common event at the first level (2/3 nodes). Moreover the 11q deletion, one of the major unfavorable marker of disease progression, occurs before 3p loss indicating that critical chromosome aberrations appear at early stages of tumorigenesis. Finally, we also observed a significant (p = 0.025) association between patient age and chromosome loss in stage 4 cases.

conclusionThese results led us to propose a genome instability progressive model in which NB cells initiate with a DNA synthesis uncoupled from cell division, that leads to stage 4S tumors, primarily characterized by numerical aberrations, or stage 4 tumors with high levels of genome instability resulting in complex chromosome rearrangements associated with high tumor aggressiveness and rapid disease progression.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCell Transformation, NeoplasticGenomic InstabilityMachine LearningModels, GeneticNeuroblastomaHumansNeoplasm Metastasis

Identifiers

PMID26358114
PMCPMC4566396
OpenAlexW1814669080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.